User talk:Dmvasconcelos/sandbox

Wikipedia Article Evaluation
Article Title - Botany

Notes -
 * The article contains useful information. Some of it is a bit out of place. For example, the introduction is a bit long. It should be concise and give a general overview of the topic.


 * Much of this article is facts, not so much opinions or claims and with this many, if not all, have citations.


 * Some images such as the Punnett sqaure in the Genetics paragraph or the photo of Ronald Fisher in Modern botany are helpful and aid the text in reaching the reader. However some images such as the Calvin cycle in Plant biochemistry is a bit distracting and draws away from the information.


 * Some of the citations are books so I searched the ISBN number to ensure the title matched with the Bibliography and all of the randomly chosen ones, all of them were correct. Now whether or not the actual facts within the book match the facts contained in the article is still not established.


 * A majority of the online sources work properly.


 * There is no major evidence of plagiarism.


 * The Talk Page is majorly concerning changes in wording or sourcing.

Cycads
Cycad Editing Sandbox

For edits for Cycad see my partners Sandbox