User talk:Dmytro

Hello Dmytro, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them;


 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. By the way, the link to psychology on your web page points to when it should point to.

Angela 22:22, 24 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Hi Dmytro, great to see you work on the articles on Cardinal numbers! You will have noticed that the article on rank-into-ranks in particular needs quite some work before it actually will be understandable and self-contained; I saw that you worked on that one, and if you have an actual definition of rank-into-rank cardinals somewhere, it would really be great if you could add it to the article. Thanks. ^_^ -- Schnee 12:19, 25 Sep 2003 (UTC)

More welcome
A good mathematical resource is also WikiProject Mathematics and its talk page, which serves as a board to discuss all math-related issues on Wikipedia. There is also a list of participants to sign in. Enjoy! Oleg Alexandrov 22:17, 27 May 2005 (UTC)


 * And thanks for your work on huge cardinal. You improved it, and probably more improvement is needed. Oleg Alexandrov 22:17, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

History of Wikipedia
have you a source to write "However, some of the Wikipedia articles were found poorly organized and confusing." All what I have read was something such as "both have mistakes and organized confusions" (about the 50 articles look by Nature). If you talk about "some of the Wikipedia articles" out of this 50, please correct your sentence. Yug (talk)  16:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

re: Thermal Conductivity Edit
Thanks for the warn mate!! I thought actually it would be "from" small particles. Is it "for" still better?--AlchemistOfJoy (talk) 15:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I had to ask, beacause I'm not a native speaker. Cherrs!! --AlchemistOfJoy (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nash equilibrium
Hi. I reverted your edit because you didn't provide a citation from a reliable source. We need sources for assertions. I'm not a mathematician but I don't see how you could have an infinite number of choices. These games are about cooperate or defect. Without those strictures how could there be an equilibrium, at all? Chris Troutman ( talk ) 05:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I restored the edit, adding a citation and a clarifying example. Let me know there are any problems. Dmytro (talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * No, that'll work. Thanks. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 06:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ineffable cardinal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weakly compact ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ineffable_cardinal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ineffable_cardinal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Dmytro (talk) 15:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)