User talk:Dnaile mrbonez

February 2024
Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tim Burton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Princess Bride (film). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:39, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Princess Bride (film) was changed by Dnaile mrbonez (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888177 on 2024-02-05T05:39:03+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rain Man, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rain Man. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't understand. I am allowed to edit my own sandbox wikipedia. Why are you reverting my edits? It's not public. This is my own and you are hurting my feelings! Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 05:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Actually, wp:sandboxes are for practicing editing articles. Not for vandalistic or disruptive edits. &#45;-  Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 05:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

My future edits will have factual information, and I will cite reliable sources to support the content I contribute. I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's content guidelines and policies, and I am committed to adhering to them strictly. Thank you. Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Could you be more specific? What topics do you want to edit? PhilKnight (talk) 02:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I am interested in music. Years and dates are my specialty. I'd like to contribute interesting anecdotes and fact-check any content that may not be reliable. Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 03:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

2nd Unblock Request
I hope you're well. I have taken a contemplative break from addressing this issue. During this break, I have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's regulations. I am asking if it'd be possible to unblock me and restore my editing privileges. I never meant to vandalize anything, I was simply under the impression that I was in a personal sandbox, my edits being not public or disruptive. However, I realize now that I wasn't in a sandbox and was editing REAL Wikipedia pages. Again, I apologize. This mistake will not happen again. Please consider unblocking me. Dnaile mrbonez (talk) 03:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I have offered you a path to being unblocked. I'm quite concerned that, above, you indicated you plan to contribute anecdotes. If that's still your intention, it shows a profound lack of understanding of what Wikipedia is all about. Hopefully by now you already understand how inappropriate this would be, and you can demonstrate your clear understanding by following the path I have offered you. --Yamla (talk) 10:05, 17 July 2024 (UTC)