User talk:Do Not Ever Drink Soda

A tag has been placed on Terry Marker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 18:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Thomas Mosser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 18:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Gilbert Murray (lobbiest) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 18:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Hugh Scrutton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 18:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Unabomber victims
Victims of the Unabomber are not notable simply because they were his victims. You might consider adding information about these people to the Theodore Kaczynski article.&mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 18:09, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Then why is David Gelernter notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Do Not Ever Drink Soda (talk • contribs) 18:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Because he did other things that made him notable, it isn't just based on his being a Unabomber victim.&mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 18:35, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Buffet Festival
A template has been added to the article Buffet Festival, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. P4k 02:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:CME46. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 17:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note, I am the same person as CME46; someone blocked me on CME46 due to misidentifying me as a previous vandal. This is not vandalism. Do Not Ever Drink Soda 18:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe that blocked users can still edit their own user pages and talk pages. That being the case, it would be better for you to edit the page as that user, thus proving it's not vandalism. &mdash; Timotab Timothy (not Timdagnabbit!) 18:50, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

No they cannot. My password for CME46 is richard if you want to confirm. 71.60.175.4 19:10, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Acey
A tag has been placed on Acey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk|Contribs) 06:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Marasmusine 08:43, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:CME46. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. →  j acĸrм  ( talk  |   sign  ) 23:24, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I gave you the password for CME46 to confirm. it's "richard". CME46 was blocked because it was misidentified as someone who was blocked before. I have no idea who that person is Do Not Ever Drink Soda 04:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

1-800-701-BOMB
A template has been added to the article 1-800-701-BOMB, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Kwsn  (Ni!)  23:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

1-800-433-8321 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1-800-433-8321. Since you had some involvement with the 1-800-433-8321 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 20:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)