User talk:DobriAtanassovBatovski

Welcome!


Hello, DobriAtanassovBatovski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Vanjagenije (talk) 17:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

Speedy deletion nomination of Communication and Computer Network Technology
Hello DobriAtanassovBatovski,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Communication and Computer Network Technology for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Computer network.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Passive voice
Hello, DobriAtanassovBatovski. You recently added a publication called "How to Use Active and Passive Voice in Scientific Publications" to the article Passive voice. That article is about the passive voice generally, not about advice related to use of active or passive voice. There is some usage advice in English passive voice. However, I also notice that the author of that publication is "Dobri Atanassov Batovski". If you are the author, you may have a conflict of interest in editing. There is more information at Best practices for editors with close associations. Cnilep (talk) 11:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Sourcing and other problems
Please note that drawing a conclusions based on primary sources (as you did here) is considered original research on Wikipedia. Content should be based on reliable secondary sources and those do not reach this conclusion. Also you seem to be marking all of your edits "m" (minor). Please check your edit settings and/or read Help:Minor edit. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2014 (UTC)