User talk:Docdik

ELNO
Hi, please read wp:ELNO #'s 2 and 11. NJGW (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * nothing on this site is factually innaccurate, do the calcs, its just maths Docdik (talk) 21:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * No one has made any statements about the accuracy of the equations... but they still violate the standards for inclusion. NJGW (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Look at it this way: there are tens of 1000s, if not 100s of thousands of similar blogs out there (which claim to have technical information related to a WP page).  Rather than allowing each blogger to post their link and letting each page duke it out over whether the link is needed, ELNO #11 was written.  NJGW (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm not that bothered, (I'm rather new to this) I can see your point but if my entry broke the rules, so did the entries above it. Interestingly I've not found another site that clealy points out some of the financial folly in the energy game, please point the 1000s out or give me a link to some of them, I would be sincerely very interested. There are millions of dishonest sites telling us to to do the financially rediculous to save energy and many of them government sponsored (particularly in Europe). ''' As and Englishman, what does "duke it out over"  mean? by the way'''