User talk:Docfont

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Docfont, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Azov Battalion seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type on your talk page here, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Nick—Contact/Contribs 19:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Azov Battalion has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Azov Battalion was changed by Docfont (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903253 on 2015-03-09T20:30:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Azov Battalion with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nick—Contact/Contribs 20:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Per above
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. thanks. Ism schism (talk) 08:51, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.