User talk:Docjudith

Welcome!
Hi, noticed your recent physics edits. Thanks, and I hope you have a satisfying experience here. Cheers, Wwheaton (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry that I had to be the spoiler, but I reverted your edits on the LHC article. The information you linked seemed to refer to a different accelerator, KEKB in Tsukuba (Japan), which is an electron-positron collider. It does not seem obvious to me that the phenomenon described in the article occurs at the LHC as well. Besides, this is rather technical stuff and in my opinion it does not really refer to an "operational challenge". Feel free to discuss your point of view if you think I am wrong. Cheers Ptrslv72 (talk) 13:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Ouch, that was my first reversion! but agree with your point about being under 'operational challenge' and will check the reference. I'm swamped with similar references and it seems I may have posted the one with a CERN heading but with data from various sources. The increasing oscillation phenomina certainly does occur at the LHC, is very central to the science and operation, and it's a bit of a glaring omission in the page that it's not referred. I'll do a better job on it, and it deserves it's own sub heading. For your interest there are nice powerpoint versions of the Ruggiero lectures, (Google; Ruggiero-Lecture2-ecloud-bb-Rome-2006-ppt) which cover it well if still a bit technical for public consumption, but I don't think I can post a link to that anyway. What do you think? --62.49.28.139 (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

User-space vs. article-space
Hello. You seem to have moved your user page from user-space ("User:(name)") to article-space. This will probably prevent you from seeing automatic notices about talk-page content, and may also cause confusion. I've asked for advice about the situation here. --Christopher Thomas (talk) 19:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Discrete Field Model
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Discrete Field Model. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Discrete Field Model. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)