User talk:Docsejmsb

Paul Shrivastava
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paul Shrivastava, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/shrivast.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Shrivastava
A tag has been placed on Paul Shrivastava requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Drdisque (talk) 17:54, 22 October 2010 (UTC)


 * You can't just cut and paste stuff from sources for which you do not own the copyright, and changing the odd word doesn't alter that &mdash; hence four deletions. Nothing was linked to other articles, a sure sign of plagiarism, and the lists of publications alone is an obvious text dump. The fact that it's just copied means that you have made spammy claims which need independent verifiable sources or removal. Examples:  as a key consultant to major multinational companies. During his early career (1976), Dr. Shrivastava was part of the leading management team that launched Hindustan Computers Ltd., one of India's largest computer companies.


 * Dr. Shrivastava won the Fulbright Senior Scholar Award and studied Japanese management while based at Kyoto University. In addition, he founded the Organization and Natural Environment Division of the Academy of Management (AOM). &mdash; surely important enough that there should be some independent confirmation of this?


 * His work has even (?) been featured in the Los Angeles Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Philadelphia Inquirer and on the McNeil-Lehrer News Hour. &mdash;, fine, let's have links to the newspaper articles.


 * have a look at Lynton K. Caldwell as an example of a well-written biography. You can get away with a list of publications, if you must, as long as properly formatted and without commentary. The rest must be in your own word with proper references. It's more work, but needs doing to avoid another chop. If you want, you can do a draft here and let me know when you are ready for me to have a look  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)