User talk:Docski35

Please do not recreate deleted articles as you did with THE GREAT MOCKINGBIRD. If you wish to contest the deletion, please instead refer to Wikipedia's Undeletion Policy. Philippe Beaudette 01:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding The Great Mockingbird article
Please see the No Original Research policy on Wikipedia. The article you have created violates this policy and that is why it has been proposed for deletion.User:  Hdt83  |  Talk/Chat

The Great Mockingbird
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

To Kill A Gatsby
I have added a "" template to the article To Kill A Gatsby, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. It appears this isn't the first conspiracy page you've tried to create. Please find some reliable sources before making any more of them. Since you'd taken a few days off...this is your new "last warning" --Onorem 00:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: References
What do I put if the main source of reference comes from reading the book?
 * If the main source of reference comes from reading the book...then you need to read the No Original Research link which was linked above in the "Regarding The Great Mockingbird article" section. --Onorem 02:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

It's not original cause I didn't make it up.
 * Not one link you have provided in the reference section mentions both of these books on the same page. Unless you come up with reliable sources, this article will be deleted. Right now, there is nothing to indicate that it isn't original research. --Onorem 02:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: you can sign your messages by typing ~. (shift + the key to the left of 1 on a standard keyboard.) --Onorem 02:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

''Oh you'll see in 5 days I'll have so many links to gatsby and mockingbird conspiracy sights that your mind will blow. ''
 * That's fine...as long as the sites are actually reliable sources...--Onorem 02:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

References...again
I've reverted the links you added over the last 24 hours. Try adding some that are related to your supposed conspiracy. --Onorem 22:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

''What if I can prove that I'm Harper Lee. Then do I get to keep the article?''
 * Only if you can provide reliable sources for it. Who you are is not important. --Onorem 22:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Harper Lee wrote To Kill a Mockingbird, so wouldn't that be like the ultimate outside resource. Does wikipedia pay you or are you just administrator dude for the fun of it?
 * I know who Harper Lee is. No, that wouldn't make you the ultimate resource. You obviously haven't read any of the links to reliable resources that I've left here previously.
 * No. Wikipedia does not pay me.  As far as I know, they don't pay administrators either, but I am not an administrator. I am just a regular editor dude for the fun of it... --Onorem 01:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Last warning
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 04:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)