User talk:DoctorKarpiak/sandbox/CRM447WFall2020Group4

=Peer review and Feedback= I think this section definitely needs work, so it is a good choice. My questions are:
 * 1) What sources do you plan to use here.  Remember that the goal is to make use of things emerging from class discussion
 * 2) Given that, it might be helpful to reflect on whether any of the people we've read would like the focus on community policing as a set of methods. Maybe they would.  When Bell, for example, talks about community policing, what does she mean and who does she cite? DoctorKarpiak (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

=Peer Review= This is a great section to focus on editing. There is a lot of opportunity to expand on these suggestions, which I would find further research/sources that focus on the outcomes of using these methods. It may also be a good idea to contribute your own methods with sources that indicate the effectiveness of the method. However, I might focus on methods that have solid research behind them in order to prove their effectiveness instead of overwhelming readers with too many methods. Hrbrod (talk) 19:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hello Group 4,

The article selection you have chosen to edit is especially important to have a more clear understanding on which methods work most effectively. As to which methods were not as effective. I think it is vital to inform the reader how effective or ineffective these common community policing methods are so it builds a stronger sense of foundation to expectations throughout the rest of the article.Zeebazz96 (talk) 16:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)