User talk:Doczilla/Archive 2009

Hey, D.
Happy New Year! Hope it's off to a good start. -- Tenebrae (talk) 01:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Help?
Your input would be welcome here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abomination_(comics) and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Comics

there's a degree of hostility from one user that may be able to be neutralised by several voices. I think he needs to grasp that I am open to change and that this new style is a work in progress. Asgardian (talk) 02:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Wizard World photos
Did you take the photo that's on the RlWHq website showing Jacen Burrows in front of the screen with the penguin on it? If so that would be good to add here. Teethmonkey (talk) 05:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Greetings in turn
Thanks for getting back to me, Doc. Yep, things seem to be back on track and a revised format for these articles is slowly coming together. Nice to hear that Papa Zilla has time for little Rinyah and co! :) Asgardian (talk) 04:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Just a coincidence Papa! The fact that you use it on their site is really nice though. Asgardian (talk) 02:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Aha. So that's why you have those photos! Teethmonkey (talk) 08:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Is this you pictured interviewing Blair Butler? Teethmonkey (talk) 09:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Spider-Man
Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

BOZ

 * (See above)

Hiding et al are >poking< him about adminship.

Everytime someone is hesitant, I recall your pre-RfA concerns. So (if ya wanna), would you mind helping with the prodding (sigh at noticing an unintentional pun there). - jc37 08:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Lol, you poked the other person I mentioned (below). But that's ok, sometimes it's just fun to be able to go and >poke< people : ) - jc37 09:32, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Vegaswikian
I haven't seen you much around CfD lately, so I don't know if you remember him, but I'm considering nominating Vegaswikian for brureaucratship. He's expressed interest, so this isn't an RFP (request for poking). Just thought you might be interested. - jc37 08:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Coincidence?
Any relation? - jc37 08:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * DocZilla


 * lol

Nope. I never even heard of that browser until I'd been using the username Doczilla for a long time. (more to follow) Doczilla  STOMP! 09:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh ok. I don't recall it either. But when I typed your username into the search box, I was surprised to find myself at an article : ) - jc37 09:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

And finally...
I'm finally at least semi-active again. So if there's anything going on that you think I would be interested in, or that you'd like another set of eyes on, please feel free to drop me a note (after all, I've just dropped you four : ) - jc37 08:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Did a bit of a search. Interesting : ) - jc37 09:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This was the best result so far : ) - jc37 09:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Outranking the Pope

I did notice that one. On my Google search, it's the 7th on the list. Doczilla STOMP! 09:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There were quite a few foreign language ones, but that one with the picture and all, was just great in the context of the two of us here : ) - jc37 09:48, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Comics sources
Thanks for the note - they all look good. I have a few other BenBella books and while some more scholarly looks at pop culture use the topic as a hook to really just go off and discuss some esoteric point without providing much insight into the actual "hook" there is usually always something interesting and useful in them. I'll give some of the descriptions a read and will scatter a few through further reading sections.

And yes I think it might be a good idea to a note into the mailing list. I am on all sorts of forums and lists and should be slimming them down but throwing in a quick note wouldn't be a chore and if it gets more information out into the public arena then that has to be A Good Thing. I will probably also fire off some emails to a few individuals for things I'm specifically interested in but a broader shot in the dark might shake loose other things that other people might find of interest. (Emperor (talk) 15:52, 2 April 2009 (UTC))

Alan Moore
I can never resist the temptation to stick my oar in ;)

I tangentially know John and Leah and they are always enthusiastic, and it is a worthy cause. I'm sure if he was interested some tech savvy local fan would be more than happy to help, so that wouldn't be such a hurdle. (Emperor (talk) 04:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC))


 * Very good point. Hell it might be seen as the sneaky approach - if only I were actually that cunning ;) (Emperor (talk) 04:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC))

Hello fellow admin!
Just wanted to say Hi, after having passed my recent Request for adminship. How's everything going?

I don't know how much you've looked into the comics project's GA drive; so far, we have been successful in the last few months with Spider-Man, Spider-Man: One More Day, Silver Age of Comic Books, Alex Raymond, Winnie Winkle, LGBT themes in comics, Hergé, and Pride & Joy (comics). Hope to see you around, and happy editing! :) BOZ (talk) 16:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

COI
I really wouldn't worry as long as you are clear about where problems might come in (and obviously abide by WP:COI). We have a number of comic creators as regular editors here so it shouldn't stop you.

Also looks cool and San Diego should be fun this year - be sure to see if there are any creator photographs you can help provide (a very useful angle with no COI problems ;) ). (Emperor (talk) 13:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC))

Admin hat issue
'lo guys,

I'm cross posting this to BOZ, Doczilla, Emperor, Hiding, and Jc37 because I'd like some additional admin-level input on something that ThuranX dropped on my talk page.

What he posted is at User talk:J Greb and it deals with information that' come up at Talk:Red Hulk. ThuranX's post provides a direct link to the touch off edit/confession.

Frankly, I find the information more than a little frustrating. But before moving forward I would like some input from other admins that have had to deal with these two. Admins ''other' than the one (Nightscream) currently involved in the edit war on Red Hulk.

Just try and keep this in one place I've set up a subhead under ThuranX's post to mey talk.

Thanks in advance for any input you have to offer.

- J Greb (talk) 15:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Just saying hi
Hey, Doc. As you probably surmised from my contribution history, I've been away for several months. I plan to return to Wiki-editing regularly (if not often), and it's good to see some of my old and treasured colleagues still here fighting the good fight. With kudos and regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Request for your opinion
Hi. If you have tim, can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 07:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Max Brooks
I actually did provide an explanation to my revert in my edit summary. If you look at the article history you will see that I said the link did not work for me and I assumed it was a dead link. However when I tried it again just recently it worked. I can't explain why that happened, most likely I didn't copy the entire link. Still you are correct so I will not contest your edit, but next time please be more careful when reading the edit summary. I realize that at times editing Wikipedia can be stressful, especially when you feel that someone is reverting your work for no reason at all (I have been experiencing this problem at Zombieland), but sometimes there can be an innocent (even if mistaken) reason for a revert. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Steve Bissette lecturing.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Steve Bissette lecturing.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Okki (talk) 13:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Brittany Murphy
Re this edit, that is a fully protected page. It was protected because there is no confirmation other than TMZ at the moment. 71.162.23.69 (talk) 19:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)