User talk:Dodger67/Archives/2009/January

Disruptive reversion
The edit you reverted on MoS was harmless, and arguably had some value, even tho i would not have made or encouraged it. Your pointless reversion was a disruptive edit, gives the appearance of stemming from PoV, and is likely to trigger counter-reversion. If you should revert a second time, i will block you for edit warring in accordance with the provision of 3RR that says 3 is not always permissible. --Jerzy•t 21:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)  Hello,. There is a response from me, below the message you left in the "MOS" section of my talk page. You can [ remove this User:Jerzy/tbnh-generated notice] at any time by removing the markup that begins and ends " < !-- START Jerzy/tbnh -->" and " < !-- Jerzy/tbnh END -->". --Thanks, Jerzy•t 09:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Jonty Rhodes
Hi. I've reverted back to my version, can we please discuss this on Talk:Jonty Rhodes? Thanks. Zunaid 10:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

– xeno  ( talk ) 15:13, 24 January 2009 (UTC)