User talk:DodgerOfZion/Archives/Mon/Jan/28/2008

Please! I'm not part of this shrade.
The section in question is {a) non referenced (b) The presented citations are related with the current events which the links to the ideology are not established facts. These presented citations can not be verified from multiple established sources. (c) The content of the article is about an ideology which was established during turn of 20th century and the section in question does not provide links to historical content. This brings the question if the editor had an established understanding of the original content. The section is not integrated to the rest of the content. The removal of the section does not require a DEBATE. The WIKIPEDIA prevent original research and requires established information. (a) it is original, (b) Claims are not established, (c) it is not integrated to the content. Even if we ignore the originality concerns, the copy-paste (non integral to the original article) brings the question of plagiarism. You do not have to be an expert on these issues to recognize the inherent problems. An unbiased editor could see the reasons of removing the section. I would appreciate if you refrain yourself dropping messages on my talk page. I do not know how much you know about the subject area. I do not know what you can bring to the article. I do not have time to involve with this conflict, as in the current form there is no scientific base to it. Hope best to you. Kemalist (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2008 (UTC)