User talk:Dofedave

Welcome!

Hello, Dofedave, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Greenmaven (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

January 2012
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Articles for deletion/St Peter's Middle School, Old Windsor, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. Also please note that you can only vote once on a particular issue (while I wouldn't mind more "keep"s ;). &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 10:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks for the advice - I found it very confusing to get involved in the debate so I did my best... I'll go back in and try and sort it out! Dofedave (talk) 10:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * No worries. If you need any other help at any point, talk to me... :) --> &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 11:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for helping to improve the article for St Peter's Middle School. I'm sorry that you've had such a bad experience with your first attempts to edit articles on Wikipedia. Articles on historic schools such as this do not normally get deleted. Unfortunately an editor mass-nominated lots of primary school articles over the Christmas period without making proper checks before doing so and this school unfortunately got caught up in the mess and didn't get the full attention it deserved. I'm now trying to take steps to get the article reinstated. For now I've moved the article into my own user space while I work on it and will restore it its proper page when it is has more references. If you can help to add more content it would be much appreciated. You can find the new article here User:Dahliarose/Sandbox 2. As you have the books that were used as sources I wonder if you could let me know what the school's original name was. In old directories I've come across references to both an Industrial School and a National School in Old Windsor. Dahliarose (talk) 15:32, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello Dofedave. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Duke of Edinburgh's Award, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 19:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Mail
Joe1000000 (talk) 19:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Duke of Edinburgh's Award while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 12:28, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Ah - didn't realise I wasn't logged in... I'm not used to this! Many thanks...

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)