User talk:Dofuller

R1 article
Let me first say welcome to Wikipedia. I'm happy to see someone is going to contribute to the R1 article like you are. A couple of things about Wikipedia editing policies just in case you didn't know, you're going to need to keep a WP:NPOV neutral point of view and bring WP:RS reliable sources anytime you want to edit or add something. I'm noticing a lot of POV problems already with some of the things you've edited, so it would be a good idea to read the Wikipedia policies on these things.
 * "was the first significant motorcycle in the true litre class"

Those two words show a POV and don't keep the article neutral. "True" is kind of always a bad word to use. Explain what true is instead of just saying true.
 * "sold better due partly to its pricing, partly because of Suzuki loyalists who had been waiting for Suzuki to build a motorbike objectively equal to or better than the R1 (on the track or street)."

This needs a source. For facts you claim, you must bring a source or it can't be here. All content on Wikipedia must be encyclopedic. I'm going to work my way through the R1 article and start making changes to thing to make sure they are well sourced and keep POV out. I ask that if you are going to edit, you please do the same. Thanx. Roguegeek 05:13, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

First of all, let me thank you for being diligent. I very much appreciate the effort. However, I am quite familiar with the do's and dont's of Wikipedia, and I must say that in my opinion, your recent edits of the Yamaha R1 article were not entirely without bias or POV. If you would please carefully re-read your text objectively (or have your proof reader do it), I'm sure that you will find a POV err or two. It is my aim to only contribute relevant, accurate and critical information.