User talk:Doganus

Vandals aren't "editors". They aren't even human. They're shitstains.

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  RC-0722 247.5/ 1  03:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Doganus! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  RC-0722 247.5/ 1  03:30, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Edison (talk) 03:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Account blocked
I have blocked this account because - apart from all the other concerns mentioned above - its username is not acceptable. If you wish to contribute productively, please pick a new and acceptable name. Newyorkbrad (talk) 03:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

It took me a bit to figure out why Newyorkbrad objected to the name, but when you parse it as 2 words it does become objectionable. That aside, the edit history is only one of reverting vandalism at one article. The attack tone of the edit summaries was gone in the final reversion of another editor's unintentional reversion to a vandal version, which probably happened because this editors summaries had been so inflammatory they looked like the work of a vandal. Best wishes for continued editing with another username and with a milder tone. Edison (talk) 04:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)