User talk:Doggies77

Jessie Lavington Evans moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jessie Lavington Evans, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 11:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, your submission has again been returned to Draft:Jessie Lavington Evans. It was not suitable for mainspace and sdtill 'rendered' the 'helpful hints' for creating a new article. Despite this edit summary, no references appear to have been added. Please read WP:NARTIST and note that Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple independent, reliable sources and references should be placed inline; see the guidelines at WP:REFB for instructions on how to do this. When the page can comply with Wikipedia's requirements please submit for review. Please do not out of process move to mainspace again. This could be seen as disruptive and might lead to the page being nominated for deletion. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

The previous message specifically asked that you submit the page for review and not to move to mainspace but it seems you have done so anyway. The item is not really suitable for mainspace and it could even be nominated for deletion when AfC reviewers assess it. References need to be placed inline per the guidelines at WP:REFB as previusly mentioned and you should also read WP:RS for how to identify a reliable source. 'Ancestry' for example. cannot be used. Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple sources in order that the notability guidelines (please read that page) can be shown to be complied with. Eagleash (talk) 22:57, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jessie Lavington Evans


A tag has been placed on Jessie Lavington Evans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Nathan2055talk - contribs 03:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jessie Lavington Evans for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessie Lavington Evans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jessie Lavington Evans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jack Noel Kilgour


Hello, Doggies77. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jack Noel Kilgour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)