User talk:Doh5678/Archive 1

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Doh5678, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Steve the Monkey, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Feezo (Talk) 20:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Steve the Monkey


The article Steve the Monkey has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not independently notable of the film.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Feezo (Talk) 20:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ShoutWiki


A tag has been placed on ShoutWiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cntras (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fives Athletic


A tag has been placed on Fives Athletic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. PamD (talk) 00:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Your addition to Billingham Town F.C. has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. M AN d ARAX •  XAЯA b ИA M  04:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Twinkle
Hey, when using Twinkle, make sure that you don't post a warning on someone's talk page for an edit that the user has already been warned about: such as here. Happy editing,  Spencer T♦ C 21:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, that thing that happened was weird. Don't worry, deleted my message. Thanks for notifying. Doh5678 (Talk) 21:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, it's happened to me before, but with ClueBot strangely enough...  Spencer T♦ C 04:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Such things happen - I just warned you, Doh5678, for that vandalism on Serial killer - because you reverted at same time as me, so you got the warning :-) ...which I removed, almost immediately. Sorry about that! And, by the way, re. the edits to that article - they've been oversighted, and the IP blocked for 48 hours. Cheers,  Chzz  ► 15:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh well, everyone makes mistakes! Doh5678 (Talk) 15:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

The Star
Many thanks. You really do need to make a batch of that pie, though, and photograph it! Tkotc (talk) 18:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Babbu Mann and Babbu Maan
From the page history of the first article I noticed you were involved there. The author you reverted there has copy&paste moved the article to (the correctly named) second article. As the original page history is not available in the current article there may be a licensing problem there. I don't know how to report this problem in the en wiki so I'm asking you for help. --Denniss (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The histories need to be merged, as far as I can tell, but that is a job for an administrator. Drmies (talk) 00:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fives Athletic


The article Fives Athletic has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Delusion23 (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in the March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive


On behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, we would like to take the time and thank you for your contributions made as part of the March 2011 Good articles backlog elimination drive. Awards and barnstars will go out shortly for those who have reviewed a certain number of articles.

During the backlog drive, in the month of March 2011,
 * 522 GA nominations were undertaken.
 * 423 GA nominations passed.
 * 72 GA nominations failed.
 * 27 GA nominations were on hold.

We started the GA backlog elimination drive with 378 GA nominations remaining, with 291 that were not reviewed at all. By 2:00, April 1, 2011, the backlog was at 171 GA nominations, with 100 that were left unreviewed.

At the start of the drive, the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 101 days (Andrei Kirilenko (politician), at 20 November 2010, reviewed and passed 1 March 2011); at the end of the drive the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 39 days (Gery Chico, at 24 February 2011, still yet to be reviewed as of this posting).

While we did not achieve the objective of getting the backlog of outstanding GA nominations down to below 50, we reduced the GA backlog by over half. The GA reviews also seemed to be of a higher quality and have consistently led, to say the least, to marginal improvements to those articles (although there were significant improvements to many, even on the some of the nominations that were failed).

If you would like to comment on the drive itself and maybe even make suggestions on how to improve the next one, please make a comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/March 2011. Another GA backlog elimination drive is being planned for later this year, tentatively for September or October 2011. Also, if you have any comments or remarks on how to improve the Good article process in general, WikiProject Good articles can always use some feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles.

Again, on behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, thank you for making the March 2011 GA backlog elimination drive a success.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

TY for GAA on BT (cb)
Just wanted to say thank you for the timely assessment of the Black Thunder (chocolate bar) article. It's the first article I've written to be promoted to "Good Article" status. I'm looking forward to creating more. Thanks again. Boneyard90 (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Happy to help. :). D oh5678  Talk  18:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, you've been busy on the Talk page. I saw you started a FAC banner then changed it to "Peer Review". Do you think the article is good enough (or almost good enough) to go up for FA status? Boneyard90 (talk) 00:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd say so, but not sure others will agree so peer review. On a related subject, if this passes FA, you've got WP:FOUR! D oh5678  Talk  00:30, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Bolton Wanderers F.C.
Hello, I've failed your GA nomination of Bolton Wanderers, because I felt it wasn't close enough at this time to pass. I left the issues I've found on article's talk page. Also I noticed that you haven't made a single edit on article before nominating it and it's not considered a good practice and thus is discouraged. Though it's not a big deal, I really hope that after you make improvements to Trotters article, you'll nominate it again and I'll have a chance to review it once more and hopefully pass it. Good luck. Utinsh (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! D oh5678  Talk  16:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 09:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Air France 7 Incident.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Air France 7 Incident.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375982/Airbus-crashes-jet-JFK-airport.html?ITO=1490. As a copyright violation, File:Air France 7 Incident.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Air France 7 Incident.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Air France 7 Incident.jpg and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Air France 7 Incident.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Air France 7 Incident.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.  wacky wace  09:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Air France Flight 7 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air France Flight 7 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Air France Flight 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 16:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Jones v Kaney/GA1
Your replies would be welcomed, at least as a matter of courtesy, before I renominate this. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 15:08, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your speedy response and change of heart! Regards, BencherliteTalk 16:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 05:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikification of Woodley Sports F.C.
Umm...if the check the edit history you'll see that I've put in a bit of time on this article, and would appreciate the chance to finish it. Thanks!--Wi2g (talk) 16:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry! D oh5678  Talk  16:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks again; I was almost done. In future, I'll use the in-use tag. Looks like unlike me, you'll be getting a leaderboard barnstar :-).--Wi2g (talk) 17:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi Doh5678. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Salvio Let's talk about it! 00:09, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

wikifying
"contribs" Thanks for the kudos! =) Well done yourself, getting to 100! --Fang Aili talk 03:39, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the compliment. By the way you'll win by miles! D oh5678  Talk  03:42, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Good work
on the Arb report this week; it looked almost identical to my draft (with the exception of the headers which I've tweaked, and a few small things which aren't really worth the hassle). Cheers for the note as well, Ncmvocalist (talk) 09:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks! D oh5678  Talk  12:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fives Athletic.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fives Athletic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:57, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

DKY Walkden
Hi your DKY submission for Walkden is not suitable it was first created in 2006 and has not been expanded x5 Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:34, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * OK. D oh5678  Talk  14:45, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:39, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:02, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 May 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:The Cleveland Show
Portal:The Cleveland Show, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:The Cleveland Show and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:The Cleveland Show during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk)  07:38, 10 May 2011 (UTC)