User talk:Doiscavalos

June 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Casa de sezim, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. -- ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪  walkie-talkie |undefined 15:34, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Casa de sezim
A tag has been placed on Casa de sezim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nick Penguin ( contribs ) 02:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Your blog is not an authoritative reference
Your blog is not an authoritative reference, so please don't use it as so. See Citing sources. — billinghurst  sDrewth  14:39, 6 March 2014 (UTC)