User talk:Dokos Charalampos

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. WLU (talk) 00:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree with WLU that you should not be adding references to your own papers, especially when these have been published in non-English or low-impact journals where better alternatives are available. If you think your papers are particularly suitable as references, please explain on the talk page of articles and other editors will judge them on their merit. While technically not the most important factor, sometimes free papers are preferable over those with pay-per-view (to assist with verification). JFW | T@lk  08:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)