User talk:DollyMemorial

November 2015
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  18:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Main Page (2015 redesign). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  samtar { t } 18:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Im Warned you. Your Edits are been reverted by Bonadea.

Its got Reverted because To use a encyclopedia added a space after the pipe. its the wrong one! you will redirect to Special:Statistics| instand for Special:Statistics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chazpelo (talk • contribs) 17:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ''i rewarning you because you do a reverting war. if you get banned. you can't join the Teahouse. your edits are good faith and extremly disrupive. you dont know about TW. its mean Twinkle. your edit are reverted because the formatting. "That wording is intentional"'' &#32;Chazpelo (talk) 21:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mint 3D for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mint 3D is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mint 3D until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam9007 (talk) 01:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)