User talk:Domdomloco

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France 3470   ( talk ) 16:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Stop it
You need to quit that or someone's gonna knock your block off. StringdaBrokeda (talk) 12:25, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Leeds, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Leeds was changed by Domdomloco (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852936 on 2012-07-06T10:55:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leeds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. SUwanja  Talk to Me.   Email Me.  11:34, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roderick, you may be blocked from editing. Calmer  Waters  15:24, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Watford F.C., you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Watford F.C. was changed by Domdomloco (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95313 on 2012-07-18T08:26:12+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:26, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Monotropa uniflora was changed by Domdomloco (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.948937 on 2012-08-14T13:35:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:31, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LoCO2 Energy concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LoCO2 Energy, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:49, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission LoCO2 Energy


Hello Domdomloco. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled LoCO2 Energy.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 08:32, 12 November 2013 (UTC)