User talk:Domenicocolucci

Speedy deletion nomination of Nextome


A tag has been placed on Nextome, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.nextome.net/company/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:15, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Nextome
Hi, I'm Vexations. Domenicocolucci, thanks for creating Nextome!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please address your WP:COI and read WP:NCORP. Also, what exactly does "validated by Micorosoft" mean?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Vexations (talk) 22:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Page Nextome
Dear all, with the quote "technology validated by microsoft" I refer to the IPSN 2014 event the technology was tested by expert Microsoft engineers. I’m attaching the publication: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/nextome.pdf

Thank you. Domenicocolucci (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Testing is not remotely the same as validating. To validate means to to support or corroborate claims. Those claims are made by you and your fellow co-founders. The document you provided shows no evidence whatsoever that Microsoft independently investigated your claims and found them to be correct. And in case this wasn't clear: Because you have a CoI you should cease editing the article about your own company immediately. Vexations (talk) 23:37, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Coi
Hello Domenicocolucci. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Nextome, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Domenicocolucci. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Vexations (talk) 23:30, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Coi
Dear all, thank you for the support. I’m sorry for the inconvenience, but I would like to specify that I don’t receive any fees for writing this article. I accept your advice to improve and respect the policy of Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time Best, Domenico Domenicocolucci (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2018 (UTC)