User talk:Dominic Ye

March 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Idiom has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:59, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Idiom was changed by Dominic Ye (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929911 on 2016-03-11T23:59:04+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Idiom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Iago Qnsi (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rail transport with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC) meh

June 2016
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rail transport has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tribe, you may be blocked from editing. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  01:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

No personal attacks
I have reverted your recent edits here. You will be blocked if you harass other editors—please do not repeat such attacks. Regarding your user page, Wikipedia is not the correct website for requests to be left alone—other editors will revert inappropriate edits and provide advice where needed. Johnuniq (talk) 10:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 00:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined unblock requests should not be removed. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Actually, considering that this compromised account can never be unlocked (and you did confirm again that it had been hacked in the dialog that you removed), you have no legitimate use for this talk page and so I have revoked your ability to edit it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:23, 26 December 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 03:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Block/Sock
For anyone reviewing this editor, and in case you hadn't realized I was just playing along with the hacking claims above, I don't believe a word of it. The block should be seen as a straight disruptive editing block, and the editor therefore not allowed to create a new "unhacked" account. We have already had User:DominicYeet and a lame attempt to pretend that is his father - see this version of my talk page, last two sections, and DominicYeet's immediate creation of Requests for adminship/DominicYeet (deleted - admin only). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)