User talk:Dominik92/Coach2

deletion (NET June 30 2009)
Let's start with some deletion questions. Again, take your time in answering.


 * 1. How would you close the following AFD's? Edit neither the exercise nor the 'articles'. Give your view of the consensus and how you reached your conclusion on this page.


 * A 1


 * Delete The article is mostly fancruft, containing no information that pertains to the real world. It fails WP:RS and WP:N, considering no reliable, independent sources exist. Looking at the other one mentioned in that article, which is virtually the same thing, it is quite clearly established that the article constitutes fancruft. "Keep" people don't give any arguments as to why it should be merged, except that more time is needed- but considering the subject matter, it is unlikely that the article could ever evolve into something encyclopedic. The DominatorTalkEdits 15:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * B 2


 * No Consensus While a simple tally would show more people in favour of deletion, Afd is not a vote and there are arguments on both sides that have been ignored by the other. It is true that no single accomplishment of the individual seems to meet WP:N, his career overall arguably meets the criteria as stated by Trident13. BtW if I was just !voting, I would most likely !vote "keep". The DominatorTalkEdits 15:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * C 3


 * Delete While personally, I would !vote to keep as I have found several reliable sources about Denner, the result of that AfD is a delete since a) none of these sources were provided by anybody and b) the one "keep" argument seems to be rooted in WP:NOHARM. The DominatorTalkEdits 16:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * D 4


 * Delete Article fails WP:V and especially WP:NOTE. The one bit of information provided (about the security) is not enough to assert the notability of the entire mall. The DominatorTalkEdits 16:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * E 5


 * Delete Same as the first example on this page, gamecruft and "keep" arguments are merely based upon WP:ILIKEIT and no arguments are given to establish why this article is notable in a real world perspective. <tt>The Dominator</tt><tt>TalkEdits</tt> 01:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * F 6


 * Speedy keep Places are automatically notable as others have pointed out. Btw, I do realise that in reality, it was found that the article is most likely a hoax, but still.... the debate ended in a "keep". <tt>The Dominator</tt><tt>TalkEdits</tt> 01:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * 2. When closing a deletion discussion, when may you disregard comments and !votes?
 * A. When comments are made by IP users with very few contributions; when the comment is only a vote without any rationale behind it; when a comment is only a vote and a support for somebody else's position (eg: support per nom); and bad faith edits- personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. <tt>The Dominator</tt><tt>TalkEdits</tt> 16:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * 3. What should be done with redirects to deleted articles?
 * A. Using the "What links here" special page, either delete them or find some other article they can be redirected to. <tt>The Dominator</tt><tt>TalkEdits</tt> 16:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)