User talk:DommyDom76

September 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to North Dakota, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:17, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


 * That’s very ironic considering all Wikipedia does is spout regime propaganda. What is a reliable source to you? The New York Times that covered up the genocide in the Soviet Union? Or how bout the Washington post that told the country Donald trump colluded with Russia? What about Wikileaks? Is that a reliable source? After all, they only publish direct evidence. Let me know! I’d love to follow the rules! DommyDom76 (talk) 05:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to North Dakota. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)