User talk:DonBarchanga

October 2014
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Egyptians, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anything like again and you will probably be blocked Dougweller (talk) 10:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Afro Latino (caveat 1)
Such a thing does not make sense, considering that is white, black or mestizo; all Latinos have ancestors. In Latin America there is a mixture of races, not just one. They are different countries. If as you state, Mexico top the list as the country has a population of over 100 million inhabitants, of whom a large percentage are mestizos, which according to your point of view are partly black, is not it ?; I think you're wrong, I reversed the changes. I will inquire about it. Greetings friend.Jaam0121 (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Afro Latino (caveat 2)
Stop. Do not modify the data in Venezuela. The information you indicate, it is provided by the Embaja and is older than the census, in addition, the census is more precisio Current (2011). It was done by the National Institute of Statistics of Venezuela, which is the body responsible for the demographics of the country [www.ine.gov.ve/CENSO2011/documentos/pdf/ResultadosBasicosCenso2011.pdf]. So do not alter the information, and you had left a message but did ignore. If you continue altering and modifying the reference I will report you and you'll be blocked by a librarian. Greetings. Jaam0121 (talk) 02:46, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Linking
Please read WP:OVERLINK. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 10:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Afro Latino (caveat 3)
STOP. The national census of Venezuela is official. Jaam0121 (talk) 01:46, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Afro-Latin American. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mfield (Oi!) 04:39, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Afro Latino (caveat 4)
STOP. The information that you contribute your unsupported, or at least not officially. Considering the article, the reference of the national census is the most accurate for use in Venezuela because it is the only entity able to provide figures, not others. If you're not with it, discuss it, not undo.Jaam0121 (talk) 06:57, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Afro Latino (caveat 5)
Please STOP. Your vandalism edits are frequent as ever. If you do not agree with the information, I invite you to discuss it, not reverse and you create an edit war. STOP.Jaam0121 (talk) 04:23, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Afro Latin American
I invite you to the discussion of the article Afro-Latin American there you can explain your point of view and then a decision will be made. Jaam0121 (talk) 00:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)