User talk:DonCalo/Archive 2018

Proposed deletion of File:Giovanni Brusca arrest.jpg


The file File:Giovanni Brusca arrest.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Decorative use of a a non-free image in Giovanni Brusca. The reader does not need to see Brusca being held by police to understand that he was arrested per WP:NFCC and a non-free image is being used in the main infobox for identification purposes so this is not need for that reason per WP:NFCC; moreover, this particular image itself is not the subject of any sourced critical commentary within the relevant section, so the context required by WP:NFCC is also lacking. The event of the arrest may be have been historic or noteworthy, but as explained in WP:ITSHISTORIC that does not automatically make this a historic photo, unless reliable sources are cited which specifically discuss the photo as such."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Bernardo Brusca.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bernardo Brusca.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Salvatore Inzerillo.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Salvatore Inzerillo.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

The Dutch Revolt
Please stop erasing my edits on this page outlining the historical and religious background of the Dutch Revolt. You are evidently completely ignorant of the Dutch reformation and the theological bases of the Dutch Revolt. You are clearly a Marxist in your views of history, and have no understanding at all of the Dutch Revolt. You are also demonstrating an anti-Christian bias in your editing. Please stop involving yourself in historical articles that you have no professional or scholarly, or even common historical knowledge, and go back to your work in the mafia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puritan27 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

The Dutch Revolt
Please forgive me for seeming uncivil. But everyone of you that are involved in disputing my additions to the wikipedia article are clearly ignorant of the Dutch Revolt, and are just interested in promoting your own atheistic revisionist view of history. I don't even think any of you teach the subject at the college level. I suggest you allow those who actually know the subject and teach it at both undergraduate and Master's level courses be the one's to decide the contents of this article. It would also be helpful if any of you were actually Protestant and Reformed as well; because of course, the Dutch Revolt was a part of the Protestant Reformation. To be sure, leaving my additions out are just as absurd and anti-Christian as writing an article on the German Reformation and blotting out all references to Martin Luther, Philip Melanchthon, and the Augsburg Confession. So I suggest once again, please keep to editing subjects that you are at least proficient in. You are all grossly ignorant of basic facts of the historical and religious basis of the Dutch Revolt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Puritan27 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Giuseppe Di Matteo kidnap.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Giuseppe Di Matteo kidnap.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:00, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Nicola Petrini.jpg
Do you have any more information on the original publication? If so I would encourage you to add it to the file description page. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:30, 8 July 2018 (UTC)