User talk:DonLarge

August 2012
I really do not appreciate being able to explain myself given that there are people out there who are seeking to be destructive of my future ends.

Hello, I'm WikHead. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Donald Jeffrey Large without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, -- WikHead (talk) 00:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, DonLarge. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Donald Jeffrey Large, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Meph talk 01:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Jeffrey Large, you may be blocked from editing. -- WikHead (talk) 01:28, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Jeffrey Large, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- WikHead (talk) 01:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 01:44, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Donald Jeffrey Large with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Donner 60, I was surprirsed you removed my biography. A prior version was taken down several days ago without my knowledge. I am definitely an Independent Candidate for President of the United States


 * Donner60 couldn't have been more correct. The WP:COI concerns raised above, as well as the removal of sourced content and replacement with unencyclopedic text is troubling. Additionally, an unregistered account recently made a number of edits, including this, on your behalf. If those sorts of edits continue, I'll ask for a block of any and all accounts involved. The much better alternative, when conflict of interest is a clear problem, is to use article talk pages to discuss matters related to article content. Thanks, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)