User talk:DonVincenzo

Peanuts
Hello... please note that, as with all fictional works on Wikipedia, the correct approach is to use the present tense. Accordingly, the lead sentence should read "Peanuts is...", not "Peanuts was..." The strip may be out of production, but it still exists as a creative work. This treatment is consistent with how we write about television series, books, films, and so on. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions about this matter. Cheers. --Ckatz chat spy  04:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply. Yes, the approach can be confusing when the tenses are mixed; this is a frequent question with regards to television series as well. However, I find it helps to approach it this way: the creative work still exists as a body of work, so Peanuts is a comic strip. (That fact doesn't change unless the entire body of work is destroyed.). However, it is no longer in production, so it ran (past tense) from X to X. Thanks again. --Ckatz chat spy  05:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Miike Huckabee
You deleted 33 Kb of text on the Mike Huckabee page and marked the edit "minor". Do you know what you are doing with TW? RobRedactor (talk) 07:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't feel so bad, RobRedactor didn't bother to restore the text you removed. ThuranX (talk) 13:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, DonVincenzo. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand 16:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Welcome
 Welcome! Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add User WikiProject Films to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:
 * Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].


 * The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for January has been published.  February's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
 * Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia.  Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: I Am Legend trailer
Hi; I'm sorry you were left uncertain as to the reasons behind my removal of the information you added. I should have provided a better edit summary explaining my position. I shall attempt to do so now: I removed the information because you provided a link to a second trailer for the film, coupled with your (likely correct; I haven't watched it) interpretation of the trailer's contents. No matter how accurate the information is, Wikipedia considers this original research; that is, an editor's interpretation of something they've seen. Current rules state that such additions are not permitted. Linking to the trailer is fine, but in order for the article to contain the brief summary of its contents and the extrapolation from it w/regard to the alternate ending, it also needs to be cited to a reliable secondary source; e.g. a newspaper or respected website which makes the same connection as you did. Hope this helps, Steve  T • C 00:12, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

TV.com
Unfortunately, TV.com is not a reliable source for information. It's the same thing as IMDb, which uses user submitted information as sources, and not actual official confirmations. TV.com gets their Smallville information from the fansite Kryptonsite.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter
The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:31, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections
The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter
The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter
The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:58, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter
The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter
The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter
The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 03:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Questionnaire
As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!