User talk:Donald Schroeder JWH018/Archive I

Ed Harbison
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ed Harbison. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Jay Neal
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jay Neal. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Re:Reliable Sources
It has become quite apparent that the RFC that I proposed, one dealing simply with MMFA, WND, Newsbusters, Huffington Post, and other of this nature would be both counterproductive and useless. If you wish to start a seperate RFC for Fox News, by all means do so, but that was not the purpose of that discussion and it should therefore be archived in order to keep from cluttering up the page. Soxwon (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If I were you, I wouldn't try lumping Fox News into the category of the others, you will not accomplish anything other than a headache with Fox News (see the numerous talkpage discussions for one sentence of the Fox News article). Soxwon (talk) 06:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm saying that, wikipedia-wise, Fox News is one of those topics that everyone has an opinion about and everyone agrees to disagree. Getting anything accomplished is limited by the ideological POVs of the contributors which seem to find their way into the mix despite editors trying to limit them. Soxwon (talk) 06:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Birgitta Fritz


The article Birgitta Fritz has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers 11:24, 28 July 2010 (UTC) aa

Don, I've started the RfC regarding MMfA, MRC, FAIR, Newsbusters etc. Please continue to participate on the Reliable Sources Talk page here. Skoal. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Fracta_Jane_Doel.jpg

FnC RfC
Donald, just so you know, Silk Tort is an admin and made an admin closure summarizing the discussion. You really shouldn't be undoing his edit.--- Balloonman  NO! I'm Spartacus! 03:16, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
You have  new messages ( last change ).  — fetch ·  comms   02:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jay Neal


The article Jay Neal has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  — fetch ·  comms   02:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

AfD of Modern didgeridoo designs
Hi - Just a note to say I thought your gracious AfD nomination withdrawal here was an indication of being more concerned about what's best for Wikipedia than any other considerations. Thank you and regards, Becksguy (talk) 01:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

RfC: Partisan sources
I have proposed an edit for the mainspace of an important Wikipedia policy, the Identifying reliable sources policy. Essentially, I believe that some sources are so partisan that using them as "reliable sources" invites more problems than they're really worth. You've previously participated in the RfC on this subject, or another related discussion indicating that you are interested in this important policy area. Please indicate here whether you support or oppose the proposed edit. The original discussion is here. Thanks. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 01:47, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:SLEDGEHAMMER1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SLEDGEHAMMER1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soft sell. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ΔT The only constant 01:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is clear policy that ip's can comment at AfDs -- and anyway   AfDs are not decided by counting votes.  Making good  arguments, that's what's effective.
 * But I think the warning above is just a little excessive for the circumstances, it's not really a personal attack.   DGG ( talk ) 02:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Cinoman.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cinoman.jpg. I noticed that the this files copyright tag is missing you can add one by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 17:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bobby122  Contact Me   (C)  17:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)