User talk:Donaldmurdo

Fiona Mackenzie
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fiona Mackenzie, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Duannollaig-cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duannollaig-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Duan Nollaig.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duan Nollaig.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Duan Nollaig.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Nollaig.jpg. The copy called Image:Nollaig.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 15:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Duan Nollaig.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Duan Nollaig.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Fiona Mackenzie
I've responded to your comments on Talk:Fiona Mackenzie. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Duan Nollaig.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Duan Nollaig.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 00:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:15, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Fiona J Mackenzie.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Fiona J Mackenzie.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kilmarnock Edition concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kilmarnock Edition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kilmarnock Edition


Hello Donaldmurdo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Kilmarnock Edition".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 05:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your edit to Canna, Scotland, "I know, because I live there."
Hi there,

I'm really sorry to have reverted your edit to the island's population figures, but citations like this are the ones most prohibited on wikipedia.

I have little doubt that the population figures you give are correct, but if you were a dishonest person then, being someone who lives there, you'd be amongst those with more motivation to falsify them. I can't imagine any reason why you'd do so, but nevertheless this still comes under wikipedia's rules about primary sources.

If you'd like to correct the population figures in the Canna article, you just need to find a local newspaper article or something which gives the correct figures, and then cite that using the tags or, preferably, the citation template. If something is written by a reputable journalist then it's assumed that they've checked the facts and are not biased.

Sorry to be a nuisance, and I hope this advice doesn't discourage you from editing wikipedia. Stroller (talk) 01:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)