User talk:Dongemus

Thank you for submitting an article at Articles for Creation. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article and resubmit when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/Jasplakinolide has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Notability
Please see the following brief on notability guidelines for biographies on Wikipedia: WP:BIO. Business directories are not considered reliable sources, as outlined here: WP:RS. Also, it is generally considered poor form to create an article on Wikipedia about yourself, or a company you work for, WP:COI. There are many other ways you can contribute on Wikipedia. Best regards. -- Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 08:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of CowboyNeal
I have nominated CowboyNeal, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/CowboyNeal&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 09:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Time Out
Hey, I just wanted to take a time out for a moment, and talk to you as a person. I know this probably feels like you are getting raked over the coals on one of your first articles. For new users, the process of inclusion can be daunting. I'm not sure you can imagine how many of the billions of people with an internet connection want to have articles on Wikipedia. There have to be guidelines in place to make sure that only the articles supported by significant coverage in reliable, third party sources are finally included. Otherwise, Wikipedia will become nothing more than a repository of trivia. If during this process, the proper information is uncovered that proves your assertion of notability, I myself will withdraw the nomination of this article on the AfD board. So please don't feel that you are out of options, or that we are all just a bunch of meanies. Best regards. -- Oliver  Twisted (Talk) (Stuff) 11:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bugera
Hello, Dongemus,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bugera should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Bugera.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Itsalleasy (talk) 18:54, 14 January 2014 (UTC)