User talk:Dongringo

Welcome!

switching languages
I would like to integrate spanish and english pages into a category, any idea how that should be done? Thanks Don Gringo 02:32, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * You might want to look at Naming conventions and Categorization. Punkmorten 10:11, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Any photos of the volcanoes themselves??
Don Gringo, do you have any photos of the volcanoes themselves that you could upload?? I do like the photos on the couple of articles that you've written, but Los Tuxtlas needs one or two as does Sierra de los Tuxtlas. Madman 05:21, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

coming soon - Volcanoes of Los Tuxtlas


 * Great, Don Gringo! I'll look forward to seeing a photo or two.  I would like to merge your recently-created Volcanoes of Los Tuxtlas article into the Sierra de los Tuxtlas article since all these volcanoes are in the Tuxtla Mountains, and the Tuxtla Mountains were created by volcanoes.  Madman

los Tuxtlas should be Los Tuxtlas. Volcanoes are a subject to themselves, and although these volcanoes are part of the Sierra de Los Tuxtlas, they deserve their own space, while being referenced within the geographic complex of Sierra de Los Tuxtlas, which is the primary component of the political and touristic area of Los Tuxtlas.

Had enough Tuxtlas?


 * I can't understand why the "L" should be capitalized in "Sierra de los Tuxtlas" or indeed in any phrase. "Los" = "the", right?


 * I absolutely love the photos you're uploaded, particularly the ones on Sierra de los Tuxtlas and Catemaco. Fabulous.


 * Regarding the writing a separate article on the volcanoes, be my guest. I personally think the volcano info should be included in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas article, but whatever . ..


 * Thanks, Madman 00:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Check this link and you´ll find the Los in Los Tuxtlas is treated as a proper name http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=los+tuxtlas&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Search I have no idea how to place a signature block DG

Municipio
Don Gringo, the term municipio is translated as "municipality" in Wikipedia (and presumably elsewhere), even though it's not what we think of as a municipality. Madman 01:13, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

The political status of a Meican municipio is not equivalent to anything in the US - but any gringo understands the concept of county. And go ahead find me two that will agree on the concept of municipality, which primarily refers to city.

The main city in a municipio is the cabecera, and when another city within the municpio gets big enough it usually breaks up into 2 municipios. That´s why there are 232 or so in Veracruz and about 3600 in Mexico. Nevertheless, gringoistically, it helps to differentiate between purely the city and its surroundings (county), if you can think of another name for that are, be my guest - just as long as it is NOT municipality - which noone in English accepts.

More Tuxtla photos
Don Gringo:

The photos you mentioned are just gorgeous. One or more of them would be a great addition to Wikipedia. Perhaps the owner would be interested in uploading them?? Madman 15:36, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Looking for Olmec photographs
Hey there, Don Gringo, it's me again, with another request.

I have been writing quite a bit on the Olmec but I feel that the articles are hampered by the lack of photos. You apparently live in the old "Olmec heartland" and I'm wondering if you ever get a chance to photograph Olmec artifacts or Olmec sites. In particular, there is a museum at Tres Zapotes and at San Lorenzo as well the Parque La Venta and the separate museum at Villahermosa.

As you can see, we do have lots of colossal head photos, but a shot of the so-called "altar" and any and all artifacts would be wonderful.

Thanks again, Madman 20:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Brujos of Catemaco
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Brujos of Catemaco, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.catemaco.info/activities/brujos/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Brujos of Catemaco and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Brujos of Catemaco with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Brujos of Catemaco.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Brujos of Catemaco/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Brujos of Catemaco saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Whpq 22:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Brujos
A template has been added to the article Brujos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. B figura (talk) 04:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Brujos
Brujos, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Brujos satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Brujos and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Brujos during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. B figura (talk) 04:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Brujos of Catemaco
A tag has been placed on Brujos of Catemaco, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. B figura (talk) 05:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Brujos_of_Catemaco, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. B figura (talk) 05:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Inappropriate? Which planet are you from? Don Gringo 00:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Dongringo

Proposed deletion of Maxacapan
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Maxacapan, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Hard to understand article. Unsourced and uncited. Some parts aren't even in English.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Undead Warrior (talk) 03:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Maxacapan
I have nominated Maxacapan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Maxacapan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Undead Warrior (talk) 02:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of English blogs in Mexico
I have nominated English blogs in Mexico, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/English blogs in Mexico. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.  role player 00:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Editorial Mazatlan


A tag has been placed on Editorial Mazatlan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)