User talk:Dongsoola

Welcome!
Hello, Dongsoola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Anotherclown (talk) 09:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Korean War edits
You will note that your changes to this article have now been reverted twice (once by myself and now another editor). Since you are new I'll assume you were unaware but it is considered fairly poor form to restore your edit once it has been reverted, especially as it is under active discussion on the talk page (which you are obviously aware of given your participation in that discussion). The relevant policy is WP:BRD which I cited in my edit summary when I reverted your initial change here. This relates to the "Bold, Revert, Discuss" cycle and is designed to ensure articles are developed collaboratively and to limit disputes. If you genuinely are interested in improving the article you need to be prepared to discuss your proposed change on the talk page and provide evidence that your interpretation is supported by reliable sources (pls see WP:PROVIT). Once you have done that only if there is a consensus amongst the editors involved in support of your change can it be implemented. If, however you decide to revert again without achieving consensus for your viewpoint that would probably be viewed as disruptive and may result in you being blocked. Anotherclown (talk) 09:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GeneralizationsAreBad (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

라동수,Mr La dongsoo Your sources are mostly manupulative.
Please do not fix the wiki pages based upon your political views. Please do consider the fact that constant north korean Offensive assualt that were failed lead to war preparation by making Huge tunnels to move tanks to large infantry regiments through Beyond south korean border strong-line thus making successful surprise attack for 조선통일전쟁 reunification war of Chosun(Korean empire before 1945) Korea. If your theory that south korean government was ordering assaults to north korean then how are you going to explain the fact that most of South korean soldiers were off duty AND did not have massive trained soldiers like north Korea had also if your theory was correct then how are you going to explain the fact that south Korea was not PREPARED for a war and lost its territory and military bases to North Korean surprise invasion in short period of time? if south korea was assaulting on north Korea it must sure prepared for war but it was not. Also your sources are mostly written by north korea favoring "journalists" but not proper investigators and even "making false statements on other incidents". You even mentioned the fact that history should be "judged" from neutral point of view which is very manipulative control of history. History SHOULD be "recored" exactly as it is not judged. The intervention of UN supports themselves speak the fact that UN was well aware of constant offensive north korean assualt to south korean "TO PROVOKE" south korean military and cause a war AND somehow NEUTRAL PEACE KEEPING United Nation Helped South Korea BECAUSE UN was again well aware of the fact that North Korea was using Offensive and Violent Military forces for surprise invasion and Invaded South Korea without even declaring as North Korea as state of war. Similar assaults have happening since the cease fire from both sides by north Korean all the times; offensive attacks toward south Korea even though cease-fire was signed and even sinking one of south korean destroyer warship just like right before 1950 6.25 north Korean offensive invasion to southward. If your theory is correct then why would neutral peace keeping UN always Have disputing north Korean claims as manipulative inaccurate historical "opinion"? Most of all why did the UN helped the south Korean Government by gathering military forces from lots of different countries who ALL agreed the fact that north Korean military forces Invasion southward as an unlawful and imminent threat of world war 3? If your theory is correct how did North Korean got their Russian t34-85 tanks and all other armoured vehicles from Russia to deploy all at underground tunnels which all lead to behind of south Korean border's strong defense lines? Rmskawk (talk) 08:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)