User talk:DonkeyGoatFace

Any comments or questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch.
I don't bite. DonkeyGoatFace (talk) 13:28, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018
Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Talk:Giorgi family have been reverted or removed because they could seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 14:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi ScrapIronIV: fair enough. Think it's relevant for a talk page, given claims made, but you've been on this longer than I have so I'll defer to your expertise. DonkeyGoatFace (talk) 15:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * To assist you, the appropriate policy is defined at this link and the section which addresses non-article space is here.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:22, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Your edits
You seem to be using Wikipedia as a tool to disparage Aspect Consulting and anyone associated with it. I can't point to a single edit and say that it's inaccurate or unsourced, but the cumulative effect of your edits does not adhere to the ethos of WP:NPOV. You're rapidly approaching the limits of what may be considered acceptable.

Adding requests to Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences while logged out, and adding to those same requests while logged in just 5 minutes later gives away your IP address (and concealing your IP address is part of the benefit, maybe the biggest benefit, of registering an account). Depending on what the truth is, carelessness or deceit, one of the following cautions is due :- uw-login or uw-agf-sock. Have a read and heed whichever seems appropriate or, better still, heed both.

Given that you'd already edited two related topics before editing the requested articles page my scope for assuming good faith is very limited. Cabayi (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Agreed. I've removed obviously irrelevant, disparaging and personal content from three pages. 10:07, 12 February 2018 (UTC)ParisClementine (talk)

Proposed deletion of Aspect Consulting


The article Aspect Consulting has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable organization lacking in-depth, non-trivial support."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 22:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aspect Consulting
Hello DonkeyGoatFace,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Aspect Consulting for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:49, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Aspect Consulting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aspect Consulting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aspect Consulting& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aspect Consulting


A tag has been placed on Aspect Consulting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Organiccovfefe (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Cabayi (talk) 11:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)