User talk:Donnatar

I guess you are referring to "urquhart" and you are making an assumption that since the IP is the same it must be the same person? I do not agree with that assumption since many people can be using the same IP all over the world. To further explain, my wife and I have been following Richard Kimball's progression in the telehealth space and we are avid telehealth proponents given the mess the US healthcare situation is in and how it is affecting my family today. If you read up on Richard not only will his programs help healthcare but in addition they will reduce the high cost of Gov't entitlement programs affecting the budget. In addition we both have been to Scotland thus the reason for the account names to be named after castles. I recall, in the USA at least, you are innocent until "proven" guilty and merely having the same IP does not prove guilt. Maybe you should read up on Gestapo tactics since it seems that those are the ones you are deploying. Furthermore can you explain if my account was closed for any other violation other than your supposed IP matching? I would like both accounts reinstated asap. If not, I will pursue this issue to the top of command. 01:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)01:48, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Please understand that the whole of Wikipedia is a wiki. A page about a specific subject is not a WIKI - it is an article. Articles are not 'approved' in the sense that I think you use. An Articles for Creation submission may be rejected (as the one in question was, several times), or accepted for publication in main article space. That does not mean that the article is officially a permanent part of the encyclopaedia. It is still subject to the rules and policies, as one editor saw fit to move it into an open area, out of the protected environment of Draft space. Wikipedia as a whole bears no responsibility for the article's future. In addition, it would appear to me that you might do well to read WP:COI about conflict of interest. BTW we do not have 'moderators'. The article was nominated for deletion by an administrator, but any editor may nominate an article the same way. DGG was not acting in his capacity as an administrator by doing this, merely as an editor. Administrators (and only administrators) may delete articles, but he chose to take this one to discussion instead of deleting it. Peridon (talk) 10:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)