User talk:Donner60/Archive 21

Archive 21 starting with closed talk page threads after December 15, 2020 through January 13, 2022

Hold your horses, please...
I find it odd that you removed my post to the Troy, Ohio page regarding local author and lawyer John Fulker before I had the chance to link a source or create a page. My edit is 100% factual, as anyone who does a search for "John Fulker, Troy" would quickly learn.

While I understand your desire to make Wikipedia better by providing sources, please give people a chance to add sources. You removed my edit less than a minute after it was posted. This is not fair. Also, you did not follow normal protocol for disputes. You were supposed to contact me to discuss your issue with my edit, not remove it.

Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Troygirl20 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * There was no dispute. You added a name, unsourced, about a person whose notability and identity were not established by a Wikipedia article. It is common practice when reviewing to revert such edits and it is proper under guidelines. Every day, and frequently, names of non-notable persons are added to Wikipedia articles. If they were passed by when noticed, they would sit untouched when almost 100% of them are added contrary to the guidelines and are non-notable. If you can source the edit, great, go ahead. Donner60 (talk) 02:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Variety (magazine) IS a reliable source.
Please stop undoing my edits. Variety (magazine) reported that Jimmy Dore bought a big walled compound for $1.9 million. It is a FACT, whether you like it or not. Here is the source: Political Commentator Jimmy Dore Buys Rambling L.A. Compound and Inside Jimmy Dore’s San Fernando Valley Home GriftExposer (talk) 03:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I only reverted your edit once. Your edit was not properly sourced because you give no publication details (e.g. date, page). Citing sources, Help:Footnotes for properly inserting this information in the article. And what is the source for "This revelation by Variety magazine led to widespread criticism and charges of grift and hypocrisy," which has no citation following it. Donner60 (talk) 03:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

note to 172.58.59.92
Unfortunately, whoever left the edit that you reverted didn't get your message because I got it instead. I must be sharing an IP with that user via my ISP because I live alone and keep it secured. If you want to repost it, I'll leave it alone so they can get it, or whatever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.59.92 (talk) 23:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

British Isles
why do you insist on using a much hated and politically charged term for the islands of Britain and Ireland. One term clearly signifies the historic dominance of one island over the other. And as millions of people object to the term it would be best if you didn't use it. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.251.104.142 (talk) 03:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Seriously. The title of the article is British Isles. Go through the procedure to change the title, if you think it will succeed and you wish to refer to them under a rarely if ever used name. Donner60 (talk) 03:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Gobstoppers
It's a fact. People want to be serious, they look for facts. I actually sucked a Gobstopper and counted the time it took to dissolve. 10 minutes, 0 seconds. No more, no less. Try it for yourself, I'm not trying for amusement. I am a very serious person myself.76.180.56.43 (talk) 01:04, 19 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Right. See Verifiability, Reliable sources, Citing sources, What Wikipedia is not. Donner60 (talk) 01:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Defamation note
From a law firm web site, in lieu of a legal treatise or essay, as info: https://www.minclaw.com/legal-resource-center/what-is-defamation/can-dead-people-defamed/ "Under common law and according to the definition of this defamation, deceased individuals cannot be defamed. Defamation is defined as an act or statement that damages one’s reputation. The dead do not have reputations to damage. The memory of a deceased person can be damaged, but this is not addressed under the tort of defamation.

"Survivors or descendants of the dead have no legal claim on behalf of a deceased relative’s good name, nor can they collect on behalf of their own interests relative to that person’s reputation. Likewise, the estate of a deceased person cannot be liable for the defamation of the dead. Survivors, relatives or friends of the deceased may, however, have a cause of action if the defamation reflects on their own reputations and they have, in fact, been defamed by the statements." Donner60 (talk) 23:13, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Incorrect information removed
Again I thank you for removing the info. Kid was being creative but trying to use your info as a template, when I had to stop her because she happened to gain access to my laptop. Please forgive me for this. DiGiori (talk) 04:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho


 Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

Season's Greetings
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Donner60: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, — Amkgp 💬  09:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas
Happy Holidays text.png

Hello Donner60: From high in the Canadian Arctic I hope you enjoy the holiday season, Quviasukvik, the Winter or Summer solstice, Christmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah or even the Saturnalia, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:07, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Adapted from Season's Greetings

Thank You
Thank You for the Seasons Greetings-RFD (talk) 12:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you from me as well! Have a good one! Hhfjbaker (talk) 15:41, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
  "And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,  I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.  For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord." Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) is wishing you a  Merry Christmas. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove. Spread the cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas!
 Merry Christmas! Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten! ¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua! God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus! Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce! Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством! শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스! สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành! Hello, Donner60! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! Linguist111talk 23:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Merry Christmas Donner!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Donner60: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Jerm (talk) 00:05, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas
I don't have a fancy display, but thanks for your holiday wishes - I am optimistic for the New Year for all of us! Thanks for all your contributions!Parkwells (talk) 19:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks from me too. :-) Lofty   abyss  17:47, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing
G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team

Happy New Year!

 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

. Thanks. Happy New Year to you. I was looking for a New Year template a few days ago. I have used one in the past. I couldn't find where they are hidden. Now I can use this one a few times. I think it could be overdoing it to use it for anyone to whom I sent season's greeting posts, however. Donner60 (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Donner60!


Happy New Year! Donner60, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

2021
Hello Donner60, I wish you and your family a wonderful and healthy new year 2021. Hope we meet again next year on Wikipedia. Best wishes --Serols (talk) 16:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Donner60!


Happy New Year! Donner60, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

– Davey 2010 Talk 00:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Trombiculidae: Revision history
What does this mean? Why did you revert? curprev 20:22, 28 December 2020‎ Donner60 talk contribs‎ m 23,812 bytes −40‎  Reverted edits by Harrisd5917 (talk): please use the talk page (WP:TPHELP) or be bold and fix the problem (HG) (3.4.9) undothank Tag: Rollback)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrisd5917 (talk • contribs)


 * I left this message on your talk page: As I look back at this, it appears to be just a Manual of Style problem. Instead of "NOTE:", a simple statement that these are not "jiggers" or pronounced as such and not chigoe fleas, rather than a direction to the reader would be more appropriate. My message was inaccurate, to say the least, and also neither informative nor necessary. The edits did not justify a revert and a template message. At most I should have simply left a message about my view that this wording was not appropriate and an explanation along these lines. I am sorry for not handling this correctly and I am striking the above message. Donner60 (talk) 06:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Other work section on Matthew DeGennaro's page
I would like to add the other work section to the scientist's wikipedia page. He was an actor in a film. Dogbert903 (talk) 00:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I left this comment on your talk page: "It is especially important to provide citations to reliable, verifiable, third party (neutral sources) when adding information to biographies of living persons. Many unverifiable, even bogus, edits are made to such articles. Biographies of living persons, Verifiability, Citing sources, Reliable sources, Help:Footnotes. Also see External links." I also left a list of links to helpful Wikipedia page guidelines and policies. Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Donner60!


Happy New Year! Donner60, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

North America1000 05:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Battle of Umberkhind
Shivaji Maharaj was an Emperor. We don't call him Shivaji. The proper way to mention him is Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaj or Shivaji Maharaj for short. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:101:BF90:21AF:6CA6:45E7:D18A (talk) 03:03, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * He was a king or "just" a Chhatrapati, not also a Maharaj, as near as I can determine. What is your source for calling him a Maharaj or an emperor? The head of the Mughals was the emperor of the region at the time, was he not? Was there more than one? Donner60 (talk) 03:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Random message
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/786380305799708672/796482957320912916/unknown.png I'm not sure why or how, but a message notification taking me to this popped up while I was browsing the Metroid Prime 4 article. I highly doubt this was intended for me, considering I wasn't even 10 at the time and was completely unaware of the concept of "Wikipedia vandalism". Someone know why this is here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.175.212 (talk) 21:04, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * IP addresses get reassigned. Since this was just noticed almost five years later, it was almost certainly intended for someone who had this IP address in the past and made a questionable or other type of edit not in line with Wikipedia guidelines. I am striking the message on your talk page because, even though obviously old and outdated, it should be noted that the current person who has this IP address (you) must not be the user who this was intended for some years ago. By the way, since no further messages were left, the person was perhaps not a "vandal" but just someone unfamiliar with the guidelines. Maybe the edit was viewed as a personal opinion rather than a verified fact. Donner60 (talk) 01:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

User page note
Strange as it seems, an ECo user changed the number in my vandalized pages user box by one on January 1, 2021 and left no edit summary. The Editor Interaction Analyser shows no interactions between us. I made an edit the same day and thought I had changed it when I noticed the user box change. Noting it to myself to record that I didn't miss this odd occurrence. Donner60 (talk) 05:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Epoxy
What I deleted is duplicated text, almost identical as the trailing portion of the paragraph immediately above it. Baip (talk) 03:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the explanation. I am striking my original message on your talk page. Please use edit summaries. Donner60 (talk) 03:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I followed your suggestion and remade the change. Thanks for the additional links on my talk page. Baip (talk) 03:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Wholesale Reversions/Edit Warring
Hello, the article Press TV where you undid my edits require a discussion on the talk page please. I have posted several times there without your response. The revisions you undid included only meticulously examined resources. The article was made more neutral. Please respond on the talk page before just wholesale reverting anything. DeweyDecimalLansky (talk) 04:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I made one reversion of wholesale deletions which appear unsupported and not neutral - not more than one reversion. Due to your assertion of edit warring, which actually are directed at someone else, I will make no more edits to the article at this time and leave it to dispute resolution and administrators to sort out. Donner60 (talk) 04:09, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

WP 20
Thank you for good wishes! - Happy Wikipedia 20, - proud of a little bit on the Main page today, and 5 years ago, and 10 years ago, look: create a new style - revive - complete! I sang in the revival mentioned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

. Thanks, Gerda. I had thought of myself as a newcomer for quite a while. Now I have been writing and editing for more than half the time that Wikipedia has existed. Your personal talents and background have added much value to Wikipedia. Thank you for your many high quality contributions and the encouragement that you have given to so many of the contributors to the project. Donner60 (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Not the End of the World edit
Hello, I'm pretty sure the message you sent me was automated, but I don't think I really need a source to know for a fact that Smile is Katy Perry's fifth album, not her sixth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.161.136.155 (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Since it is shown in Smile (Katy Perry album) and other sources as her sixth album, I think you do need a verifiable, reliable, neutral, third party source to verify that it was not. I left some helpful Wikipedia page links on your talk page. Donner60 (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Katy Perry's albums: One of the Boys (2008), Teenage Dream (2012), PRISM (2013), Witness (2017), Smile (2020). That's five albums, I couldn't find any other information about a full-length sixth album, though I found one EP that she released under her real name, which I don't think really counts.

209.161.136.155 (talk) 00:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The All Music web site counts MTV Unplugged as one of her albums, https://www.allmusic.com/artist/katy-perry-mn0000859589/discography. So Smile is the sixth. The individual page for the MTV Unplugged listing is https://www.allmusic.com/album/mtv-unplugged-mw0001337838. See also https://www.discogs.com/artist/971243-Katy-Perry which lists six plus the EP. I am reasonably sure others, besides the Wikipedia article on Smile (Katy Perry album) can be found but that should be enough. Donner60 (talk) 01:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Goodbye Alice in Wonderland
Hello,

The editor that edited this page on 1/12 inserted the certification table for Jewel's previous album 0304.

If you look at reference 24, 25 and 27 on this current edit it leads you to the the sales certifications for 0304.

The Billboard link in reference 27 is the same one for reference number 2 and it shows that this album was not certified and it only sold 377,000 copies. Even the second paragraph in the intro to this page states It had sold 377,000 copies in the U.S. as of June 2010.[2]

The editor on 1/12 is just trying to insert incorrect sales information into this article. 2601:644:8500:F830:CD2B:BFA4:FEA1:FF8F (talk) 00:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I have already deleted the first message on your user talk page without leaving another template message; only an explanation of the revert, which I have now amended as appropriate because of your explanation. Your edit has now been adequately explained above. I have rolled back my revert so that the original edit by you has been restored. Thank you for your explanation and patience. Sorry for the inconvenience. Donner60 (talk) 00:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Jadon
Hello, I am Vijender Singh Jadon from India. I saw wrong information about my family on Wikipedia and I tried to change it but it got reverted back by you. Jadon's have their kingdom in Karauli...there lives a Royal family to whom you must seek information they have all the authenticitic proof which supports my facts. Vijender Singh Jadon (talk) 04:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * A person adding content to an article based on personal knowledge or experience is are not a reliable source. The editors and readers do not know who that person is and whether they are telling the truth. Wikipedia cannot take user's word for types of edits which could be joke edits, vandalism, invasions of privacy or simply mistakes. It is especially important to avoid this in biographies of living persons. The edits must have citations. Wikipedia guideline pages also point this out. I have added six quotations from these pages to your talk page and a list of helpful Wikipedia policy and guideline pages. Donner60 (talk) 06:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Bully
Bully Maguire should me mentioned in the article as it kinda defines the movie overall, especially the iconic dancing scene.


 * Your edit included "considered to be one of the most famous scenes in film history." Such a claim needs to be backed up by citations not just the assertion of an anonymous user. It is easily questionable as just your personal opinion. Verifiability; Citing sources; Help:Footnotes. Donner60 (talk) 05:01, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Eskimo
Hey Donner, I made a change to the Eskimo wiki page to update the etymology section, clarifying that the term was considered offensive to most Alaskan natives, this is included in at least 2 of the sources already provided in the article, I was just clarifying that although the etymological origins of the term have been discredited, the term is still considered offensive. The wording in the section is a little confusing because it makes sound as if the term is not considered offensive. I hope that clarifies things. https://www.uaf.edu/anlc/resources/inuit_or_eskimo.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaisyTheSadboi (talk • contribs) 04:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Even without your edit, the article contains the following text - with citations - "Regardless, the term still carries a derogatory connotation for many Inuit and Yupik." So your edit, which is added to the sentence before, which defines the term, is unnecessary in any event. If not, I would recommend repeating the references after the first sentence as well to avoid controversy. That seems redundant, however.


 * Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners; Identifying reliable sources; Citing sources; Help:Footnotes; Verifiability; No original research; Neutral point of view; Notability; Biographies of living persons; What Wikipedia is not; Manual of Style/Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. I hope you will review at least the first five short links above and that you will continue to contribute to Wikipedia. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Also the term Eskimo may not be offensive to some people in the Western Arctic and Alaska. I still here people from Alaska call themselves Eskimo. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * . Thanks for the comment. I am glad that some people watch this page. I log on many days but real life sometimes intervenes for at least a few days. Donner60 (talk) 23:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

A Ballad About Greenwood 04:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
I just discovered that my adult autistic daughter has been editing Wikipedia articles. She makes lists from IMDb of animated series and movies with their release dates and memorizes them. When she sees a discrepancy of release dates between IMDb and Wikipedia, she tries to change Wikipedia; or if Wikipedia only has the month and year of release, she tries to add the day. She's tried to make a few edits of content besides dates also. The page User:SummerPhDv2.0/KIDSTVDATES describes her pretty well. I'm glad she's not the only one, but I'm sorry it has become a problem. I've spoken to her about it and she says she won't do it again. Sparkmadley (talk) 06:04, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * . Thanks. I worked on a program for autistic children for some years so I understand. Donner60 (talk) 23:49, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Max Benson
Hi those are all correct edits. Patrick McGrew has been special Ed director since 2013. Please reverse https://www.davisenterprise.com/news/local/school-board-hires-two-principals-special-education-director/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpunkersOnTheBeat (talk • contribs) 00:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC) SpunkersOnTheBeat


 * The 7 year old reference that you added simply says McGrew was appointed head 5 years earlier; the other recent references do not name McGrew as one of the responsible parties and he should not be included unless he played a part in the 2018 tragedy. I added some helpful Wikipedia guideline and policy pages to your talk page. Although I reverted your additional edit(s), I left no further "warning" messages. Donner60 (talk) 00:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Milorad Umelek
milorad umelek you erased my edit he is a terrorist and is in jail for 147 years he s a self proclaimed special force agent what i dont uderstnad why would you errase or edit it if you dont know who he is ? the source comes from international court hague and interpol whats is your job just to reverse edits without even knowing anything abotu that terrorist ? instead of reversing it why didnt ou ask me a question so i can fix it your way — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.131.167.137 (talk) 21:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)


 * This is well over one month old. Your edit has also been reverted by another editor. A brief explanation as well as template explanations were put on your talk page at the time. You provided no references for the changes that you made; no verification of your assertions. Your personal assertion is not a reliable source. It is your responsibility to add references for verification of such serious changes or additions to the article. Verifiability, Biographies of living persons, No original research. A list of links to Wikipedia pages that can be helpful in referencing and learning other format and policy guidelines was left on your talk page. The first five of these are for new users, including help getting started and referencing for beginners. Donner60 (talk) 01:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

It's A Sin
I don't see what the fuss is about. I corrected a typo: the word 'similarly' was misspelled. Your message implies I need to justify it. Seriously? The two-panel comparison shows the edit clearly. I've never had this kind of feedback and I've edited many articles (and donated annually) since Wikipedia first appeared. This seems heavy-handed. In addition, your instructions on how to add information here are quite sketchy. 08:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 52.119.113.97 (talk)


 * I have struck the above message on your talk page because it was a mistake. I see you have re-entered the correct edit. I am not sure why I made this mistake but suspect I was trying to click on an error in the previous (or next?) article that had come up in the feed and somehow misclicked it. I have experience a slight delay in the Huggle feed on a very few occasions and perhaps that happened here. In any event, I am sorry for the mistake. Donner60 (talk) 13:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Happy Chinese New Year!


PohranicniStraze (talk) is sending a festive box of delicious candies! May the new year be happy and prosperous for you!

Wish someone good fortune by adding to your friends' talk pages.


 * Thanks! Much appreciated. Donner60 (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Columbo (character) wife's name
columbo reference https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_UN2S8SasY time location 6:15 - I am not sure how to reference a youtube video. I apologize for my ignorance with this and thank you for your time.

there is also another reference http://www.columbo-site.freeuk.com/sinatra.htm Tindrumandsteelguitars (talk) 04:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:80:C200:7240:E8E8:A2E7:6969:2473 (talk) 04:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your message. I am striking the original message on your talk page because you are in good faith and were obviously unaware of the need for a citation. I wanted to reply to you as soon as possible. I am not sure whether a you tube reference is acceptable. It may depend on the nature of the video. I will look at this and get back to you.


 * No problem. Wikipedia guidelines and policies are easy enough to learn but are not necessarily obvious to new users. Experienced users can provide some guidance or at least point in the right direction if someone is trying to get started in good faith. Donner60 (talk) 04:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

thank you!Tindrumandsteelguitars (talk) 04:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

List of rolling papers
Added Gizeh Rolling Papers to the list with information and jpeg.

How is this not constructive??? Herb.Dubee (talk) 01:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


 * You added an empty gallery along with your edit. I will here note that perhaps that was not your intention and a specific mention should have been given with the message to you. Donner60 (talk) 03:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

February flowers
... for what you said to Flyer22 --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Delta Air Lines Flight 841
In December 2020, I tried to edit this page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_Air_Lines_Flight_841, to correct the spelling and home town of a person in the article. The article mentions "Jayme Mays of Macon, Georgia". She is my Aunt. My mother was her sister. Her name has an unusual spelling and it is often misspelled. The correct spelling is "Jamye". Her hometown is Pell City, Alabama. It is not Macon, Georgia. My parents were listed as her emergency contacts at the time of the incident, and they lived in Macon, Georgia (where I was born 3 months before the hijacking described in the article). My Aunt is still alive and lives in Atlanta, Georgia. I have been trying to get the Wikipedia article updated on her behalf. She would like her legacy properly documented. I am attaching a few photos of documents that she sent me yesterday. One is a letter from the Delta President. Another is a letter from the pilot during the incident (even the pilot misspelled her name and in a way that is different from the Wikipedia misspelling). The other photo is the customer service award she received from Delta. My Aunt Jamye was originally overlooked for the service award when others received it in 1972. She was given the award in 1979. Her name is spelled correctly on the award. Please correct the spelling of her name and her home town, or allow me to make those edits.

You can also see from the letter from the pilot that Jamye Mays was held at gunpoint "at all times". That is considerably longer and much more serious than having a hijacker having "cocked his pistol at a stewardess". That fact should be corrected too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meyerjp3 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 4 March 2021 (UTC)









I have also attached a photo of the flight crew, which includes my Aunt Jamye (4th from left in white sweater). However, I believe that the Associated Press owns the copyright to the photo. Any idea how to get them to release the copyright? I believe it will expire soon because the photo will be over 50 years old in 2022.

Meyerjp3 (talk) 02:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[User:Meyerjp3|Meyerjp3]] (talk) 02:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Patrick

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Meyerjp3 (talk • contribs) 02:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Meyerjp3 (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Patrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meyerjp3 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the information. I left this message on your talk page. "I have just come back online after more than a week off. I have noted your messages on my talk page and since some technical issues concerning copyright are noted, I will reply after taking a little time to review the guidelines rather than answer off the top of my head. Sorry for the delay." I will also go back now and strike my original message because you were in good faith. Donner60 (talk) 01:35, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I added the following to your talk page: The citations, or in effect the references or proof, supporting your changes appear valid but are in unusual form. I suggest that you make the changes and put in the edit summary that the references are provided as photos on the talk page. I would also add a footnote to the article stating that references for this information is from Delta official documents and awards which are shown on the talk page. Then put an item on the talk page where you give the explanation and add the photos as proof. It would be good to find a citation, such as a newspaper article that can be found online, although perhaps the age of the incident would make that more difficult. I cannot guarantee that someone else might come along and ask for a more traditional citation but I think you will avoid further issues by adding the notes that I suggest.


 * As for the copyright of the picture, I think you will need to get the AP to release the copyright if they in fact have it copyrighted. See Requesting copyright permission. The following is from page 3 of https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ15a.pdf, a government circular on the duration of copyrights. The photo, if copyrighted, would have been created during the period that is the subject of the following paragraph, making the total copyright period 95 years.


 * "Works originally copyrighted between January 1, 1964, and December 31, 1977. Congress amended the copyright law on June 26, 1992, to automatically renew the copyright in these works and to make renewal registration for them optional. Their copyright term is still divided between a 28-year origi-nal term and a 67-year renewal term, but a renewal registra-tion is not required to secure the renewal copyright. The renewal vests on behalf of the appropriate renewal claimant upon renewal registration or, if there is no renewal registra-tion, on December 31 of the 28th year. For details about the benefits of making a renewal registration, see Circular 15, Renewal of Copyright."


 * I hope this helps and will allow you to make the changes without issues. Donner60 (talk) 07:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Seeking Help
Hello! User Magnolia677 has targeted me and my good faith edit’s. He has continued to revert, delete & in my eyes Vandalize articles that I have had anything to do with. (See, Gary Busey, New Fairfield, CT, Joyce Randolph) Instead of helping the community he has put his own feelings first & decided to attack me passive aggressively through his editing power. I have reached out on his talk to end this by offering him WikiLove to no avail. Hoping you can help. Sincerely Yours, Elvisisalive95 (talk) 19:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I have just signed back in after several days offline. I see that the matter has progressed with the intervention of an experienced user. It appears to be concluded. If it had not been, I would have suggested you take your problem to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Before doing that, you would need to think about whether your own editing constitutes edit warring or other unacceptable editing that mya have been pointed out to you. In that case, review the relevant Wikipedia guideline pages first. Donner60 (talk) 01:30, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

WrestleMania 17
Hi. I added a remark on the WrestleMania 17 site mentioning the fact that it is widely regarded as one of the greatest WWE events of all time. That is backed by pretty much every PPV site in wrestling -infact it is considered number 1 by pretty much everybody. I thought the wording was fair and appropriate. Craig 66830 (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Without a citation of reliable, verifiable, third party sources, it is personal opinion and original research. The reader must be given a way to verify the statement. Otherwise, it could simply be the statement of an anonymous fan who wishes to hype it for some reason. (It happens - frequently.) See Referencing for beginners; Verifiability, Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Identifying reliable sources; Citing sources and Help:Footnotes. I hope you can add one, or better yet at least two, sources to support your edit. Donner60 (talk) 04:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

True Justice Episode 9 Season 1 Synposis
Hey dude you deleted my description of episode 9 of Season One of the Steven Seagal TV show True Justice despite the fact that it was accurate. Have you seen the episode in question? What about it was factually inaccurate, and if you did not like my style then perhaps it would be more productive to try and change or update my description rather than taking the easy way out and deleting it. Would love to chat more, and if you has seen the show would love to have you on my podcast The Multicultural Greaser to discuss it.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.183.208 (talk) 22:44, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your polite and appropriate comment. I will reply on your talk page. Donner60 (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism on Honda Aircraft Company Page
Hello, You recently marked an edit of mine on the Honda Aircraft Company page as disruptive. I'd like to ask that you please revisit the page in question, and especially look at the recent edits by user Vegnoveg. As you will see, this user inserted the company Harlow Aerospace into the page, despite the fact that this company appears nowhere in the sources. They have made similar edits to other aircraft related pages that were reverted. As another user had reverted Vegnoveg's edits only to have them changed back, I decided to remove the offending section in question. I'm open to suggestions on better approaches, but I'm not quite sure why you'd mark my change as disruptive, as I was not the user vandalizing the page. Thank you. Yosoemon (talk) 00:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)


 * My view was that you had deleted sourced content without an adequate explanation. You have now given the explanation so I am striking the original message on your talk page. Please not only use edit summaries but give information of the kind that you given above. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Please continue editing. Donner60 (talk) 00:51, 1 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your quick response and your understanding. I will be sure to keep this information in mind for future editing. Yosoemon (talk) 01:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

St. Mary's High School (Phoenix, Arizona)
I am confused as to where I leave my inquiry, I hope this area is not disruptful, excuse me if it is. I am responding to your banning of my account due to the editing of Saint Mary's High School. I happen to be an alumni and know for a fact that my father new Mr. Hickman. He and his friend's nickname for them was indeed, 'Lil Dick'. While the name might sound rude or inappropriate (trust me I laughed the first time he told me), there is a good reason. Mr. Hickman often lost articles of clothing in the gym and suspected that his fellow classmates were the reason. He would then proceed to interrogate them on where the clothing might be. This earned him the name 'Lil Dick', as in dick or detective. I hope this clarifies the change and ask that you unban my account, thank you and have a splendid day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CURL3FRI3Z (talk • contribs) 01:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The warning message on your talk page does not block your account or current editing but is a warning not to make edits contrary to Wikipedia and guidelines. Doing so can lead to a block. Also note, your personal knowledge is not a reliable source. It cannot be verified. False information could be added based on such assertions and there is no way to check it. This is tried with some regularity. Also, there is no way to know whether this is an insult to the person to which the nickname who may not even know about it.


 * I will add this and some other information to your talk page:
 * From No original research: "Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, needs a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described at Verifiability". From Verifiability: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an Citing sources to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution" and "Articles must be based on reliable, third party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Donner60 (talk) 04:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Hey
Just so you know, that Snead vandal IP is some sort of LTA that has been active for some days now.  Java Hurricane  03:31, 19 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info. Donner60 (talk) 03:33, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Javier Bardem play rugby when he was a young boy.
https://uk.askmen.com/entertainment/better_look/javier-bardem-on-spanish-men-playing-rugby-and-the-definition-of-a-good-party.html

https://www.ruck.co.uk/list-5-very-famous-actors-who-played-rugby/4/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Addendum666 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

https://elpais.com/elpais/2008/02/26/actualidad/1204012134_850215.html

https://www.elconfidencial.com/deportes/2008-02-26/cuando-bardem-jugo-en-la-seleccion-espanola-de-rugby_1046342/

https://elmasmit.co.za/daniel-craig-javier-bardem-bonded-over-rugby/

Goddess Bunny article
I Dont understand how i was being disruptive in the godess bunny article please talk with me https://as.com/masdeporte/2008/02/26/polideportivo/1204067092_850215.html


 * You may need to provide a reliable sources. Please see WP:RS. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 02:46, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Further reply on your talk page. Donner60 (talk) 02:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

False Warnings
Hello!

I am here from the warning you issued to me. My editing on the page of Lake Sevan is very much justified. I am removing false information associated with the page, and which has received vandalism within nearly the past two weeks. Especially now, after the Azerbaijani president sparked controversy associated with the Lake, many have come and edited the page to alter the Lake's history in their own favor. False information, such as user's @ZaniGiovannis edit, should not be accepted as it add's to the propaganda and controversy. Also, this "claim" never once appeared on Lake Sevan's page until the Azeri's president spoke about it. So why now is Zani adding such info?? Also, the claim constantly being edited in by @ZaniGiovanni has not been proved by historical evidence. Without documents or any other sort of evidence, how can one state such claims? Claiming something does not mean it is true without provided evidence. There is a difference in it being a neutral claim (with much evidence available), than a claim not proven. @ZaniGiovanni is indeed violating Wikipedia's guidelines in spreading false information and contributed to vandalism in one's own liking. I am only reverting this false information edited in my @ZaniGiovanni. Not only that, I have been asking Zani to provide evidence to prove this claim, yet this user denies to. I aim for justice and for the truth, but for users spreading false information like Zani is unacceptable. Next time, please be more responsible in issuing warnings and do much more research on a page than issuing warnings claiming "not justified" to revisions.

Also, if you go to @ZaniGiovanni's talk page, this user has a history with warnings, blocks, attacking other users, and spreading misinformation. Now, this user is attacking Lake Sevan's page and continuing violating more of Wikipedia's guidelines. Zani is not to be trusted with their past severe violations and is now editing several pages, just stating claims and attacking other users.

Thank you,

@BeyondSweetful (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Beyondsweetful) 3/2/21

- Lake Sevan page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Sevan

- ZaniGiovanni's page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ZaniGiovanni


 * I left this message on your talk page: "Thank you for your message with the full information about the edits to Lake Sevan. It would have been helpful to have summarized the information in one of the edit summaries or referred to the talk page of the article with a full explanation. Nonetheless, based on your later message on my talk page, I can see I made a mistake and I am sorry about that. If the previous notices from me were still on this page, I would have stricken them. Since you have deleted them, I cannot do that (without reposting them which would not be useful) so I am leaving this message to acknowledge that I would have done that. I hope this will not discourage future editing." I will add here, because of your final comments, that it is up to the user changing and deleting text to support them. You might have cut all this short by leaving an explanation in the edit summary or a remark to see a longer explanation on the talk page. Otherwise, it appeared you were simply deleting sourced information based on your personal statement that it was false. Donner60 (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

MiFi
You have retracted my edit to the MiFi ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MiFi ) article but, since it is gone, I can't remember what changes I made! I think I amalgamated info from several industry sources to update or even correct some information there, so I am confident it is valid. I do remember doing that much. I don't know what edit of mine you have retracted now. Do you have a record of it so I can validate the sources?


 * I have been offline for about 16 days, so I am just answering your question. Click on the "View History" tab at the top of the page. The first item on the list is my revert. The second item on the list, followed by your IP address, is your edit that did not have any sources cited. Click on the "prev" at the beginning of that item. Your change will appear at the top of the page. I hope you will be able to add verified information to the article. Helpful Wikipedia guideline pages include Citing sources, Reliable sources, Verifiability, Help:Footnotes. I have added this note to your talk page. Donner60 (talk) 03:16, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! (Also sent through log). Donner60 (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

take the cat
i appreciate your contribution to the "grunting in tennis" page. take the cat.

Loocuh (talk) 18:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC) 

Soft Kitty
RE: The "Soft Kitty" edit - I have no connection to the YouTube video I cited, it was only to substantiate the information I was presenting. Without the link, readers would naturally be skeptical of the claim. And, with only 35,339 views, the video is obviously not a big commercial success.


 * Move old uncaptioned item just found near top of page. This was over three weeks old; template message included note to ask for help at Help Desk. Donner60 (talk) 03:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Happy Vesak!




 Happy Vesak   , Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy and Blessed Vesak  to you and yours! User:JaMongKut (talk) 18:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit was likely good faith
Hey, Donner60. I see that you reverted this edit, and gave them a vandalism warning. Their edit was likely good faith, as they probably didn't think that it was a brand name that shouldn't have been reworded, and left as is. Don't worry- I already replied to your warning on that user about the mistake they did. Try to assume good faith. Thanks. GameTriangle (talk) 03:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Logged thanks note. Donner60 (talk) 04:31, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

EC "T" entry
This article should not exist on Wikipedia. Why restore it? Vbfwiwiwheh (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * That is your personal opinion; Wikipedia has articles on many subjects about which there are differing opinions and points of view. They can be about notable subjects, even if hoaxes. The proper way to handle this is to add reliable, verifiable, neutral, third party references supporting a differing point of view. If you wish to have an article removed, see Articles for deletion for the proper way to go about having an article removed. Donner60 (talk) 22:47, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Annamie Paul
I corrected the name of candidate "None of the Above" in the 2020 by-election to the name according to Elections Canada, https://enr.elections.ca/ElectoralDistricts.aspx?ed=2255&lang=e, namely "Above Znoneofthe". I indicated that the reference for the correction was the official information from Elections Canada.

Please don't be so quick to assume bad faith. 2607:F0B0:7:838D:C143:575:40BE:EEDE (talk) 22:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Extremely odd, very few if any people would check to see if the change from none of the above is correct, but it is correct nonetheless. Charge of bad faith not appropriate considering the situation. Struck my original message. Donner60 (talk) 22:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Donner
If It’s the correct information, surely there’s no vandalism in that? Go and get a degree at college or something other than monitor bots on Wikipedia. Nikephoros1 (talk) 22:54, 26 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The bot delivered the wrong level template, and indeed the wrong wording, although that is usually not the case. For that I am sorry for the unintended nature of the message. On the other hand, your edit changed Diodotus II to Diodos. That is inconsistent with the title and in fact you restored Diodotus when you changed it back. Your message could have been more civil and less presumptuous. And also, my edit was correctly changing a the Manual of Style error. If it perhaps carried some other changes with it which I should have noticed, I am sorry for that. I think a more thoughtful and civil message to me would have been more appropriate. See Civility, No personal attacks. Donner60 (talk) 23:05, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Request to undo rollback
Hello! This is regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajesh_Bindal Due to a pending decision in an ongoing litigation, certain parties are trying to pressure a serving justice by adding certain political and malicious content on his wikipedia page. By my most recent edits, I removed the political and malicious content as well as incorrect citations. I understand his original wiki page was small and removing the malcontent makes it seem as though I made his wiki page very thin. I merely restored objective language and removed defamatory and inaccurate language. Please review and consider restoring. Thank you in advance for your attention. 120.59.29.59 (talk) 03:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Because of your explanation and the fact that it seems to be an unresolved matter about a living person, I will not revert your edit again if you restore it. However, it does removed sourced content. You should be prepared to defend it with a showing of contrary reliable sources to support your position, if someone else also sees a problem with it. Donner60 (talk) 04:02, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

This place is appalling.
It's a tragedy seeing the things left out or misconstrued by so many petulant children that don't know how to analyse or qualify the material they are providing. I really shouldn't be here, but when I query a search engine I grow curious at the wiki-box that appears in the return. So much is left out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.239.100 (talk) 23:07, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The proper way to handle this is to add or change text with adequate citations. Verifiability, Citing sources, Reliable sources, Help:Footnotes. Wikipedia is written entirely by volunteers interested in the various subjects. In turn, they must follow certain guidelines, noted in the following links to start with, including the summary page of links, Help:Contents. Simply commenting about the omissions you see in articles or here will not advance anything and, as far as articles are concerned, is contrary to the policies and guidelines. If you want help adding or changing content, also see Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners; Teahouse or the relevant Wikiproject. WikiProject. Donner60 (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Martha Morrison incorrectly linked to Ted Bundu
Wikipedia has incorrect information regarding Bundy being linked to her murder. I have a Clark Countu Sheriffs Synopsis regarding Forrest dated 1978 listing Carol and Martha as Warren Forrest’s victims I have tried several times to correct your misinformation, but you don’t seem to accept it. I am attending Forrest’s trial in September for the murder of Martha Morrison. I’ve been involved with Forrest since at least 1974 when Martha was murdered, as my sister Jamie Grissim was his first victim. I have tried several times to correct your false information, so now I give up. Vintagestarr (talk) 03:52, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * You are not a reliable source. The editors and readers do not know who you are and whether you are telling the truth. Wikipedia cannot take user's word for types of edits which are often joke edits or vandalism. They must have citations. Wikipedia guideline pages also point this out. I have left links to these pages on your talk page in addition to the specific template messages.


 * If it is a known fact, then there must be a source. Wikipedia provides citations for readers who may question content. "Known facts" are not reliable sources. "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. Verifiability."


 * The following quote from a Wikipedia policy page. No original research, is also relevant here: "Wikipedia's content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The policy says that all material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, needs a reliable source; what counts as a reliable source is described in Verifiability."


 * "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish the opinions only of reliable authors, and not the opinions of Wikipedians who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves. Identifying reliable sources.


 * Verifiability. "Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form". Unpublished materials are not considered reliable."


 * Verifiability. "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution."


 * Verifiability, not truth. Essay. "Wikipedia editors are not indifferent to truth, but as a collaborative project, its editors are not making judgments as to what is true and what is false, but what can be verified in a reliable source and otherwise belongs in Wikipedia."


 * If you have a published verifiable source, other than your personal knowledge, which supports your changes, you can add it to the article. Donner60 (talk) 04:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Edit to page
Before you undo an entry that is being made to a page on Wikipedia, give me time to to cite my sources. You're being an edit Nazi by not providing a chance to make an update to a page and cite the reference source. Seriously....stop being such a jerk. AirbusA330Pilot (talk) 19:16, 29 June 2021 (UTC)


 * See Civility and No personal attacks. I will not give you another talk page warning for violation of these standards here because despite that you seem to sincerely want to make some changes. I suggest you do them in one edit or leave a message in a previous edit summary. The bot also reverted your edit which should have already been a clue. Donner60 (talk) 19:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Skirmish at Adamstown
Skirmish at Adamstown - what campaign do you think this would be? First thoughts were Monocacy or the 1864 Shenandoah Valley campaign, but it seems to be too late for either one. Just to be sure I checked Lewis's Guns of Cedar Creek and Spaulding's Last Chance for Victory: Jubal Early's 1864 Maryland Invasion and it doesn't seem to be in either one. Source is just a table in Dyer, so that isn't very helpful. Article says that commanders were Benjamin F. Kelley and John McCausland, but that's not backed up by the source and I didn't think McCausland was in Maryland that late in 1864. Not sure where to best look for sources without knowing the associated campaign - do you think this is related to one of Mosby's raids somehow? Hog Farm Talk 05:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Just put this on your talk page: Just wanted to say I have been offline and just saw your question. E.B. Long, The Civil War Day by Day, shows a skirmish at Adamstown, MD on October 14, 1864. As in almost all instances where a minor action is noted, Long shows no further details. This occurred the day after Mosby took up a section of the B&O Railroad near Kearneysville, west of Harper's Ferry, seized $173,000 from two Union Army paymasters and burned a train, according to Long. That certainly puts Mosby and company in the same area the day before the skirmish but that doesn't necessarily mean they were involved. As you noted, the Battle of Cedar Creek was only five days later so the skirmish would not seem to be connected to the Shenandoah Valley campaign of 1864. I will look into this further tonight. Donner60 (talk) 22:31, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Definitely Mosby. Sifakis, Compendium of the Confederate Armies, Virginia, page 146, shows 43rd Cavalry Battalion, Partisan Rangers, in action at Adamstown on October 14, 1864. I think McCausland may have been Mosby's nominal commanding officer. I'll look for further details. Donner60 (talk) 22:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Continued further on Hog Farm's talk page. Donner60 (talk) 01:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Gerda. Always great to hear from you. I appreciate your thoughtfulness. Donner60 (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center"> Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC) Thanks, Captain. You think of these occasions regularly, which I appreciate. It is a morale boost. Donner60 (talk) 23:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Regarding you warning
Hello! I noticed you warned the new user Tuqamajeed about their edit on an Iraqi prince recently. This editor removed referenced content and explained that their reason for doing so was that homosexuality is not accepted in their culture. They also add content of their own without references, stating that the information comes from the family of the subject. They do not appear to understand Wikipedia rules. I hope its okay for me to inform you of this, since I noticed that you took an interest. I have reverted their edits myself, but if they contest it, I don't think I have the time and energy to deal with it as I am due to travel soon, so I thought it would perhaps be okay for me to direct your attention to it. My best wishes, --Aciram (talk) 12:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I have not been ignoring it; rather, I have been offline since before you left the message. I think your action was proper. I will look at this again. Others may have taken care of further problems. Best wishes on your travel. Donner60 (talk) 02:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Tanya Tate
All additions were sourced. 197.46.126.67 (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The source referred to nine awards, not eleven. If I missed a source, you can note it to me, but better yet, add it after the sentence about the number. If no source for eleven is cited, you should add a more recent source that shows it. Donner60 (talk) 05:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The source is from 2014 when she had won 9 awards. Since then, she was won two additional awards (which are individually sourced in the table) bringing the total to eleven. I'll try to reflect that better in the article and look for additional sources. 197.46.126.67 (talk) 05:17, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Arjun Bijlani
The content removed from the page of Arjun Bijlani is not a mistake as it is wrong info ..he hasn't appeared in any of those shows like kasauti Zindagi ki, kyunki saas bhi ..etc etc ..the guest as Mayank and special appearance colomn is wrong.. wrong info is being shown on the page so my efforts were to correct it


 * Added to user talk page: Please use edit summaries. Edit summaries. Otherwise, a deletion of content without explanation is likely to be flagged or reverted, even though it may be correct. I have checked this more online and your edit seems to be correct. You probably would have avoided these messages with a comment in an edit summary. Other helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners and Help:Footnotes. Thank you for your efforts on this and I hope any others with questions about this will look at this comment. Donner60 (talk) 22:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Battle of the Wilderness
Hello I'm working on getting Battle of the Wilderness to GA or A-class. Last time I checked, it had 9,164 views in the past 30 days. Because of the high number of views, I certainly do not want to replace the article with something that is not satisfactory. I have a replacement draft in User:TwoScars/sandbox4. I kept many of the maps and a lot of the text, but added information about the cavalry and many more citations. My next task is to review each citation. A big weakness for me in Wikipedia is adding too much detail, and I have already cut some things out. I also have reservations about still saying the battle was May 5 through May 7, when Gordon C. Rhea call his book "The Battle of the Wilderness May 5-6, 1864". What would be extremely useful would be if someone would look over the sandbox draft, while the current Battle of the Wilderness still exists, to make sure I will not ruin a highly-viewed Wikipedia article. I don't need a detailed look—the new version will still go through Peer Review, GA review, and maybe A-Class review. Thanks TwoScars (talk) 20:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry that I have been offline since before you wrote the above note. I jumped in too soon with my comments because just a glimpse showed me some apparent flaws with the current article and it appears your draft has remained comprehensive. I have removed my original comments as premature and not very valuable. I will get back to you within the next day or two if not unexpectedly interrupted. Donner60 (talk) 02:53, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Soft Kitty
RE: My "Soft Kitty" edit.

I'm not sure what the problem is - a You Tube search for "Soft Kitty" does not bring up any commercial videos, just mostly cute kids.

Meanwhile, in the same text block, references 9 and 10 link directly to pages for "Big Bang Theory" merchandise. If that's not commercialism, I don't know what is.

j.kernkamp@gmail.com


 * I was reviewing changes, not the entire article. I agree with your interpretation of the text block and the citations. I have removed it. Your edit appeared to be promoting a YouTube channel. YouTube is generally considered an unreliable source. although there may be some exceptions if they comply with guidelines such as those quoted here. Perhaps you can justify the addition in an edit summary if it meets the guidelines if your wish to add it again. Note: Reliable sources/Perennial sources: "Most videos on YouTube are anonymous, self-published, and unverifiable, and should not be used at all. Content uploaded from a verified official account, such as that of a news organization, may be treated as originating from the uploader and therefore inheriting their level of reliability. However, many YouTube videos from unofficial accounts are copyright violations and should not be linked from Wikipedia, according to WP:COPYLINK. See also WP:YOUTUBE and WP:VIDEOLINK."
 * Generally, communications on aspects of articles are not private and should only be on talk pages, not on personal e-mails. Also, Wikipedia guidelines discourage identification of a person's name. That means if you have an account, you are encouraged not to use your name in the e-mail address. If you do not have an account, you can include your e-mail address in your profile for private correspondence. (You edited under an IP address; I do not know if you still do so or have an account since your message is not signed with four tildes.) Some people disclose their names and identity but this was once estimated to be about 5% of users. While the chance of a problem resulting from such disclosure is small, and might well just be transfer of a snarky comment to e-mail rather than talk page, it is not non-existent. In any event, I respond to you here and not via e-mail. Donner60 (talk) 10:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Hello nice to meet you! Theonararya (talk) 07:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the greeting. I have been unusually busy in "real life" recently and have been offline since before you left your note. I am just getting back to a few things tonight. I am always glad to see someone else who is interested in military history becoming active on Wikipedia. Best wishes on your editing. Donner60 (talk) 03:04, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you don for your compliment and happy early christmas to you! Theonararya (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Note: I clicked on the link to check out the survey and received a message that it was not active. Perhaps it is too late? Donner60 (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">Happy Holidays text.png Hello Donner60: Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:12, 22 December 2021 (UTC) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">Happy Holidays text.png Hello Donner60! Enjoy the holiday season&#32;and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:36, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)