User talk:Donnythedragonfishslayerx3

Speedy deletion nomination of BobbyAndRicky
Hello Donnythedragonfishslayerx3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BobbyAndRicky for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:48, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BobbyAndRicky


A tag has been placed on BobbyAndRicky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  00:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BobbyAndRicky


A tag has been placed on BobbyAndRicky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Interference 541 (talk) 02:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BobbyAndRicky.


A tag has been placed on BobbyAndRicky. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BobbyAndRicky.


A tag has been placed on BobbyAndRicky. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gronk Oz (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at BobbyAndRicky., you may be blocked from editing. ''This article has been tagged for deletion five times now. As the author of the article, you must not remove the deletion tag - if you wish to dispute the deletion then follow the link on the deletion message and explain your reasons. If you continue to engage in disruptive editing, including re-creating deleted articles and removing the deletion messages, then your account may be blocked.'' Gronk Oz (talk) 09:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I think "vandalize" was the wrong word to use. However, there are at least two reasons why your attmempt to create an article about "BobbyAndRicky" is unsuitable:
 * 1) The subject comes nowhere near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
 * 2) Creating an article "to have a wikipedia article about themselves to help there [sic] followers or fans know more about them", that is to say to use Wikipedia for publicity purposes, is against Wikipedia policy.

You are very welcome to start contributing to the encyclopaedia on other subjects, but please drop your attempts to use it to publicise "BobbyAndRicky"; otherwise there is a danger you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)