User talk:Donpedersen

Speedy deletion nomination of Astrium north america


A tag has been placed on Astrium north america requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:01, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Snaju


A tag has been placed on Snaju requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Astrium
If you try again, read WP:NPOV first and remember that the use of 'we' and 'our' screams 'SPAM' to patrollers and admins. You should also read WP:RS which is about the reliable independent sources you need to use as references. (NOT the company site - OK as an external link but any company site is unreliable so far as we are concerned - or blogs and press releases.) Then you should show the company's importance IN the article. Do this in a subpage of your userspace and the penultimate thing (hopefully) is asking an admin or a regular editor for an opinion (and advice). Putting articles up here is easy. Getting them to stay is a bit harder until you know the ropes. Forgot to put WP:CORP in there. Peridon (talk) 19:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)