User talk:DontSpreadLiesTellTheTruth

Previous accounts
Are you the same user as and ? — Czello 12:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)


 * No are you? What is your interest in destroying this man?  You're being cruel and inhumane.  Stop it!  The things you so aptly want to spread are the rumors are nothing more than gossip and tabloid writing. DontSpreadLiesTellTheTruth (talk) 13:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Good, now that you are blocked, the actual issues with the page can be dealt with. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 13:06, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * and the issues aren't anything to worry about. Newsweek source dates to 1999, at which time it was generally reliable. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 13:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * For the record, these three are ✅. firefly  ( t · c ) 13:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Someone should do some stats on the relationship between usernames containing the word "truth" and likelihood of that account being indefinitely blocked at some point. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 13:14, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Your recent editing history at George Richey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello 12:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — Czello 13:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)