User talk:Dont even try to hide the truth

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Fram 10:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. I'll send the bill to Jimbo since I've already talked to him a few times.  I hope he pays me more than he pays you.  I mean even a penny would be a notable payment considering. --Dont even try to hide the truth 10:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Please
Try to be civil. And do not refactor warnings. Refactoring a warning is generally considered vandalism. --Woohookitty(meow) 10:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * A false warning should be refacted and IS NOT vandalism. You people at Wikipedia are confused. --Dont even try to hide the truth 17:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
As this user's only edits were to continue the bizarre agenda only previously pursued by user:Chakabuh by vandalizing IFD listings removing IFD tags and posting blatantly false copyright tags,,, all with the dishonest edit summary claiming that he was removing vandalism, I have blocked this user as a disruptive sockpuppet. Postdlf 13:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Abuse by Postdlf
Postdlf removed liscensing information from images that were being used as references to compose an article about the "owner" of AHBL. The licensing system only offers US Fed Government instead of giving choices to indicate State government. Postdlf used this error to justify deletion, I corrected the images to indicate State government and then Postdel reverted my good faith edits.

This here is evidence that Postdlf has abused his administrative powers:

This is what Postdlf wrote on the IFD:
 * QUOTE: "Uploaded by Chakabuh. These were all uploaded as part of what appeared to be an agenda against a non-notable individual, whose article was recently deleted. Postdlf 16:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)"
 * Postdlf claims Bruns is non-notable, yet the AHBL article mention lawsuit Scoville Et Al., vs. Bruns Et Al.. The reason the case is against Bruns Et Al is because AHBL is Bruns.  Bruns J. Bruns is as notable as AHBL. --Dont even try to hide the truth 17:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * QUOTE: "These are NY state government documents that were mistagged as US-Gov-PD. While I think we would never be in any legal danger for using them, these are unused in any article and involve criminal charges against a private citizen that were for the most part dropped." Postdlf 16:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)"
 * The charges were not dropped. Postdlf is gaming the system; the licensing should be changed to indicate a STATE government.  These images were used as references for the Brian J. Bruns article which Bruns fought so hard to get deleted and when it failed he mustered support then AfD'd the article wherein his supporters all voted delete while others abstained because they had no clue and because Bruns had misrepresented the references to hide the fact that he is a convicted felon and were NOT "for the most part dropped." --Dont even try to hide the truth 17:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * QUOTE: "The article's author kept trying to claim that the indictment for the N.Y. crime listed as "156.30" proved Bruns was convicted of computer trespass, but it's really just an indictment for software piracy (see deleted talk page history of article). Continuing to host these could only lead to further such abuses. Postdlf 16:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)"
 * This just shows Postdlf does not know what he is talking about. Bruns was indicted for 2 counts.  One was dropped per a plea agreement.  He was convicted of the other.  Look at the documents. --Dont even try to hide the truth 17:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

There will be more court documents coming soon to show how Postdlf and several others have been tricked by Bruns. We will get these references into Wikipedia regardless of your attempts to downplay the notability of Bruns and your whitewashing. There is a possibility Bruns may be going to jail again and then we will document all the misguided statements made by Postdlf, Phroziac and the others who have been duped by Bruns. Your attempts to stop this EXPOSURE are futile. Bruns violates the rights of others and will be exposed. --Dont even try to hide the truth 17:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)