User talk:Dontlike123

Welcome to the English Wikipedia!

 * }
 * Welcome to the English Wikipedia; I have created your account for you! Technical 13 (talk) 19:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mozart Popart


A tag has been placed on Mozart Popart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson  talk to me  23:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Mozart Popart, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   23:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Friendly's. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. i as trying to make bullet for the flavors please dont delete it
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Friendly's was changed by Dontlike123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899549 on 2014-01-28T00:04:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Friendly's with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. K6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 00:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)i am not being disruptive i was trying to do my best please dont bother me again

then bring back te original publicatin to the article

Speedy deletion nomination of Curtis Blake


A tag has been placed on Curtis Blake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dan653 (talk) 00:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Presley Blake


A tag has been placed on Presley Blake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 02:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Please, take a look at some of the guidelines and policy pages up above before you do any more edits. I don't want to see an admin come down and block you because he saw the numerous warnings on your talkpage and think you were being disruptive. TeleComNasSprVen (talk &bull; contribs) 02:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Your edits across multiple articles are disruptive. In addition, the material you add is unencyclopedic, often replete with spelling and grammatical errors. At this rate, you may be indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Armor Frey
Hello, Dontlike123. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Armor Frey, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ColonelHenry (talk) 05:39, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You are just getting beat up here since I created your account. I've USERFIED this draft for you (you there is a handy box to help you create and maintain drafts on User:Dontlike123/sandbox and you will find a link to this draft inside) and tagged it as an Userspace draft.  Per NOTWEBHOST and similar you will have to continue to work on it or it will eventually get deleted.  Other pages of interest you should read about this include 42, GNG, BLP, and if you fail to keep working on it, someone will {{subst:Submit}} it for you and it will get deleted under CSD:G13 six months later.  I think I've given you all of the tools you need for this project of yours... Don't be afraid to put Help me on this talk page with a clear question, leave a message on my talk page, or ask for help over at The teahouse (you have an invite just above)... There are LOTS of people around who would love to help you, you just need to ask.  Happy editing!!! Technical 13 (talk) 06:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Summer of My Life


The article Summer of My Life has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * An unreleased single? No other reasons why this would be notable? Not listed at e.g. Allmusic, and the two youtube links don't work as well (probably copyvios anyway). Fails WP:NOTABILITY completely.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:25, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your request for undeletion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is friendleys. JohnCD (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent uploads
Hello Dontlike123, you recently uploaded a couple of screenshots from copyrighted TV programs. While you did fill out the fair use rationales, you seem to have missed a crucial point: Why are no free equivalents available? Particularly for living persons the default assumption is that a freely licensed image could be found or taken. Thus non-free images of living persons almost never are acceptable (not even Kim Jong Un was considered enough of a recluse that we couldn't expect a freely licensed image to exist). The rest of your fair use rationales also is far too short; in particular you don't even identify the TV program you took the images from. Please take another look at the non-free content criteria and don't upload non-free images of living persons. Huon (talk) 02:52, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

i tried to answer each question

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Walt disney234r.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Walt disney234r.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 21:32, 2 February 2014 (UTC) that was not a violated edit i made it is fair and legal


 * No you didn't. For example, "n.a." is not a valid explanation why a freely licensed image cannot be found instead. I also begin to doubt that you really took all those images with your own camera in 2010. Huon (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

you think too many weird idea i have a camera on my laptop and i was trying to make picture and ask peole for them

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Diana disney123erf.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Diana disney123erf.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 22:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jay harmol.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Jay harmol.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 07:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hamol123ed.png


A tag has been placed on File:Hamol123ed.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 07:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:George hormel34rtf.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:George hormel34rtf.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 07:56, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jame hormel334r.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Jame hormel334r.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 07:57, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nutella234r.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Nutella234r.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 07:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nutella son.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Nutella son.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 11:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

i am not trying to copyright images from sites

Image authorship?
As the author or copyright holder of the images you uploaded you claimed "Jason Mills" for rather unrelated images, "Jason Jills", "Jill Mill", and other variations along the same lines for a couple of the now-deleted images, "Jason Sill", "Jason Phills", "Jason Wills" and so on. That seems quite a coincidence unless you chose the pictures to upload by the photographer's name. Can you please provide some evidence that those people indeed hold the copyright to the images you uploaded? Huon (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

how am i gonna really do that? people have differant names i dont like when you delete those picture in the first place please i am tryng to male pages look better


 * To be blunt, to me this looks as if you made up that information and faked the "fair use" claims in an attempt to make the images look superficially acceptable. That obviously won't do. Huon (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

i was just trying to e better at wiki i was only not being blunt i was always getting annoyed for this


 * Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously because it has legal implications. Thus it is far better not to have an image than to have a non-free one for which we cannot claim fair use. And "I think we need an image and couldn't find anything better" is not by itself a valid fair use rationale. For example, does a baby photo really improve our readers' understanding of Diane Disney Miller? No. Is it likely that a freely licened image of her exists or could be produced? Yes. Thus we should not have a non-free baby photo of her. If you were not aware of Wikipedia's stance, now would be a good time to clean up the remaining images' fair use rationales, to provide more information on where exactly you got those images, and to more clearly explain why they cannot be replaced by free images, and why they're needed in the first place. Huon (talk) 23:21, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

well i like it that way its my opinion and i would like how to become the one wh claims the pcture or gives soeone else credit for someone else work please help me


 * I'm sorry, but I don't understand the question. "Become the one who claims the picture"? Image copyright is owned, usually by the photographer who took the original image. When you take a photo of a copyrighted work, be it a photo or a TV program, the original copyright holder still owns the copyright. We cannot claim the picture, we can only claim that our use of that image is covered by the legal concept of fair use. If we want to do so, we have to credit the original copyright holder (and while necessary, that is not sufficient). Do you know who owns the copyrights for the images you uploaded? Do you remember where, exactly, you got them from? Huon (talk) 00:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

yes right i was not stopping to steal anyones picture i dont claim it at all i was just trying to use it for eduction purposes

February 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Huon (talk) 23:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I have tried my best to explain why we take copyright seriously. It's pretty obvious you have blatantly lied in your fair use rationales and in the claims at the now-deleted File:Benskywalker2345t.jpg. That image was a still from Star Wars, for which the copyright rests with Lucasfilm. Micheal Stearn, on whose website you supposedly found that image (and to whose website you did not provide a link), cannot release that image into the public domain (if he exists in the first place). This kind of behaviour is not acceptable and puts Wikipedia at risk for copyright claims. Huon (talk) 23:35, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

i tried my best also i wanted to get out there was no way of really showing any images copyright teach me how to get out of tis with no problems even better please unblock me from this and help me step by step to get better at this i beg of you


 * There was no way of really showing any image's copyright? Hardly. I had no trouble at all to determine that File:Benskywalker2345t.jpg is a still from Star Wars, copyrighted by Lucasfilm and not usable on Wikipedia. I also had very little trouble to track down copyright information for File:KennethColley2007.jpg. Unfortunately what I found simply is not compatible with what you claimed. So the first step to getting unblocked: Do not lie. By now I'm pretty sure that every single one of your uploaded images was accompanied by information that was simply made up. Do you really need me to tell you that's not acceptable?
 * How about instead of me telling you something (which you don't really seem to read anyway), you tell me something instead? Let's discuss File:Edmund McIlhenny.gif in some detail. When you uploaded it, you provided this information. What of that information is correct? For how much of that information can you provide evidence? Where, exactly, did you find that image? Who is John Newman, and what is his relation to the image? Why did you think that image is appropriate for Wikipedia? Please provide links where applicable. Huon (talk) 20:08, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

how do you even know if i made a mistake or a error


 * You claimed you made an image "fair and legal" while providing a rationale of "n.a." on why no free equivalent could be produced. That by itself would be an error on your part. Given the literally incredible parade of Jasons who are supposed to hold the copyrights to the images you uploaded (Mills, Jills, Phills, Sill, Wills - seriously?) I'm pretty sure you didn't just make error but deliberately provided incorrect information. Of course you could easily prove me wrong by providing evidence for your claims. Can you? And can you please answer my questions about File:Edmund McIlhenny.gif? Huon (talk) 22:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I would also like to note that you should probably read our policy on sockpuppet accounts as attempting to create one to circumvent an existing block is strictly prohibited, and you know what I'm talking about. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 22:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

when ca i get back to editing photos


 * Not before you have demonstrated a clear understanding of Wikipedia's copyright policies and a willingness to comply with them. Huon (talk) 00:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

i will demonstrate if you can please help me first to post up pictures without problems by giving me steps please


 * You have not bothered to answer any of the questions I asked you above. I will not spend more time to educate you than you are willing to spend yourself. Huon (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
 * Here, I'll help you out a little... Read through all of the links in the following box. :>

Hello, Dontlike123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...
 * ...wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
 * ...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
 * ...wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
 * ...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
 * ...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 23:37, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Manual of Style

i didnt have a way to answers your questions i ll look and the help after you unblock me
 * Sadly for you, you will never get unblocked with that attitude. Have a nice day! — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 19:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

come on now i am really stressed out please talk to me


 * You know what questions I want answers to. "I didn't have a way to answer questions about my own edit" is not acceptable. Huon (talk) 01:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

can you just get me back on editing on wiki so i can learn from my mistakes


 * Why can't you answer Huon's questions here on this page? You have to show that you understand exactly what you did wrong first, and then you have a chance of being unblocked. --bonadea contributions talk 08:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

how can i prove first if i had read but have no vidoee of adding


 * You can start by answering questions about your past actions. The next step would be explaining to us what the problems with your past edits were, and how you're going to avoid similar problems in the future. This will take more than one line of text. Huon (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

n the past i didnt really know about how to do a wiki edit or evne how to start a proper page second the problems were that i didnt really know how to complete a page, i didnt know how to post a picture without copyrights errors and thirdly we can avid this if you can please maybe even not really block me ever again and showing me how to really post up pictures in a wiki page


 * This is not an answer to the questions I asked, nor does it show any understanding of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Let me repeat the questions: When you uploaded File:Edmund McIlhenny.gif, you provided this information. What of that information is correct? For how much of that information can you provide evidence? Where, exactly, did you find that image? Who is John Newman, and what is his relation to the image? Why did you think that image is appropriate for Wikipedia? Please provide links where applicable. Huon (talk) 17:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

i made a bad mistake when i uploaded that, i guess not much is really trustful at all i was trying to write down the first things,there is not really a link for evidence, john Newman is a made up character i though i saw, i though he was the owner, it s appropriate because the image looks good in the wiki article, i dont have links ever


 * You made up John Newman and thought he was the owner? Sorry, that does not make any sense. The basic lesson here is: Don't make up stuff on Wikipedia - not content, not copyright claims.
 * Regarding the appropriateness, Wikipedia has more standards than just "looks good". By default Wikipedia requires images to be released under a free licence that allows everybody to re-use and modify them for any purpose. However, by default images are copyrighted with all rights reserved. We can claim fair use in some highly regulated contexts given by the non-free content criteria; these fair use claims rely on truthful information. Deliberately making up entries will leave Wikipedia at risk of copyright lawsuits. We're better off without an image than with one that gets us sued. If you cannot provide evidence that the images you want to upload are okay copyright-wise, do not upload them. Huon (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

so what happands now? that did make sense i though he was even a owner, i know you will get sued but is there any way of legally copying and pasting from google images


 * I have linked to the relevant concepts and policies above. From those you should yourself be able to determine if images found via Google Images can legally be added to Wikipedia. I do not think you can do so reliably, and given your past falsifications I'd say it's likely that, if unblocked, you would continue right where you left off and add further images with incorrect copyright claims and faked or otherwise insufficient fair use rationales to Wikipedia. We cannot risk that. Huon (talk) 20:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

I promise i can do better now can you please unblock me so that i can find steps to do it


 * You can find all the information about copyright law and policy on Wikpipedia without making a single edit, so the argument that you need to be unblocked in order to do so is invalid. Start by reading the pages in the list on the right &rarr; Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  19:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

what else can i do to get unblocked
 * Are you serious? If so, answer the following questions using reasonably proper formatting and sign your answer (using four tildes like ~ ).
 * 1) When you uploaded File:Edmund McIlhenny.gif, you provided . What of that information is correct?
 * 2) For how much of that information can you provide evidence?
 * 3) Where, exactly, did you find that image?
 * 4) Why did you think that image is appropriate for Wikipedia?
 * 5) What does the image use policy say in a nutshell?
 * 6) What exactly are Copyrights?
 * Once you can answer those questions, you should be able to answer this next set which will be:


 * 1) What do you think you did wrong that got you blocked from editing?
 * 2) What would you do differently now that you know what the laws are pertaining to this?
 * 3) What would you like to be able to do if you become unblocked?
 * Give some examples of edits that you would make to articles.
 * Give some examples of files that you would like to upload, and what the rationale is that would allow them to be here.
 * 1) What net positive do you have to offer Wikipedia?
 * 2) If you were unblocked based on your responses here, and you lied to us in your answers, what would happen to your ability to edit on Wikipedia?
 * There are a lot of questions here that you need to research and answer, and I can say it is probably fairly safe to assume that until you do make an understandable attempt to answer them, that no-one else is going to respond to your pleas to be unblocked and continuation of meaningless dribble will likely result in your talk page access being removed. As far as my interest in this goes, I'm the one that created your account in the first place, and it annoys me when I create an account for someone and they don't want to follow the rules and laws.  — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 21:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Dontlike123 (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC) not one bit Dontlike123 (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC) i cant really give any evidence Dontlike123 (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)google images Dontlike123 (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)because it looked good on a article Dontlike123 (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC) that the image is t accepted Dontlike123 (talk) 00:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)copyright laws about wiki article and content i just answered it give me my next task now


 * Firstly, thanks for admitting that you faked the entire fair use rationale. Secondly, the answers to the last two questions are utterly insufficient and show no understanding of either copyright or Wikipedia's policy on the use of images. You may want to amend them; otherwise I'll have to conclude that you cannot follow either Wikipedia's policy or the copyright laws, and that you cannot be unblocked. Huon (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

He is the second one He had a lot to say, but his answer, in a nutshell, was no that what they say i the nutshell

Here is the second one abut the copyright Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material despite appropriate warnings may be blocked from editing by any administrator to prevent further problems.


 * Enough already. Either you don't have the English language skills or fundamental competence to understand what is being asked of you, or you're just trolling to waste people's time here. Whichever it is, nothing is being achieved by allowing you to continue posting badly formatted gibberish here. I have revoked your talkpage access; when you have read and understood the policies and constructed a correctly formatted, GAB-compliant unblock request, you can email it to UTRS or BASC and someone might turn your talkpage back on so you can post it. At present, though, I see no sign whatsoever that you are ready to edit Wikipedia. We're done here. Yunshui  雲 &zwj; 水  08:41, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:KennethColley2007.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KennethColley2007.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:28, 4 March 2014 (UTC)