User talk:DoodleQuik

August 2019
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

I regret having to do this, but given that you did not provide sources for any of your genre edits, and I could not independently verify several of your changes, I felt it was best to err on the side of caution with regards to your edits. You are welcome to reinsert your genre changes if you can provide reliable sources for them. DonIago (talk) 17:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Blazing Saddles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 22:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Booksmart, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 23:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Election (1999 film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DonIago (talk) 21:19, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Sourcing
Why are you adding unsourced information to Wikipedia again? ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)