User talk:Doom guy007

March 2017
Letting you know that the phrase you attempted to remove in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has been in place for quite some time after multiple editors worked on the lead. If you wish to change it, please open a new discussion on the article's talk page. I've restored the content for now. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Regarding your recent edit... This fact you are trying to insert seems random with the intention of possibly softening the blow of the previous sentence. A lot of film articles do mention the box office total gross, but it's not required and here it isn't necessary. As mentioned above, I suggest you begin a new discussion on the article's talk page if you'd like to state your case. Also, please use an edit summary when you make a change to an article letting others know about the change you're making. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 04:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   03:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 (talk) 00:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice‎. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State  ‖ 17:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

3RR block
Hi. You've been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to Edit warring. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 19:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Batman v Superman
Please go to the talk about to discuss your addition/change. It has been reverted multiple times and you can be blocked even if your reverts are happening days between each other if it is deemed disruptive. I'm not saying that I'm going to block you (I can't) or that I'm going to report you, but this is getting ridiculous.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  19:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. --GoneIn60 (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. This block is longer than the first because you continue to make the same revert. You should get consensus on talk for any edits that turn out to be controversial. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)