User talk:Doomsday28/Archive 16

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

victoria
Note to Doomsday28 : You need to learn how to calculate days from Day-1 to Day-2. Queen Victoria's reign was 23,227 days (not 23,226 as you say). Actually you have said nothing. You just fed wrong data. Check this article : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/queen-elizabeth-II/11485439/Should-we-celebrate-when-the-Queen-becomes-our-longest-reigning-monarch.html. It says the reign was 23,226 days, 16 hours and 23 minutes -> which means 23,227 days. Reign is calculated including both the end-point days. If a person became king at 11:35 PM on 21-January but died within a few hours at 4:35 AM on 22-January, the reign will have lasted only 5 hours, but will still counted as two days - 21-Jan and 22-Jan. That is how these calculations are done.

This is one negative about wikipedia. People who don't have adequate knowledge (like you) thinking that they are wise and correcting others who actually know the subject, albeit you may be acting in good faith.

Here is how it works, from 20-June-1837 to 22-Jan-1901. From 1838 to 1900 is 63 complete years, with 15 of them leap years. The year 1900 was NOT a leap year. So, (365*63) + 15 leap days + 11 days of June-1837 + 184 days (1-july to 31-Dec 1837) + 22 days in 1901. Do the math. The sum is 23,227. For this you have to set the starting date in the calculations at : 1837|6|19, one day before the ascension. 108.228.13.71 (talk)
 * ok discussions between wikipedians out to take place on talk pages and not userpages otherwise how else would i know you messaged me. 2, i dont recall making changes to her dates calculations and if i did, it was an honest mistake and 3, your message was boderline personal attack andsomewhat elitist. Doomsday28 (talk) 18:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Debate on Bernard Shaw's nationality.
Was he "Irish" or "British" or do we need to define his nationality in some other way? A debate on the subject, to reconsider a long-standing consensus that he was Irish, has started at talk:George Bernard Shaw. Just in case you're interested. Current comments are at "Nationality", at the foot of the page - although an earlier thread at "Irish"? may also be relevant. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)