User talk:Dope99

October 2014
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Gerald Milton. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hi User:Gene93k Sorry for the misunderstanding. sincerely i wanted to protest but didn't know how to go about that. Thank you. • dope99 (talk)

Deletion discussion about Gerald Milton
Hello, Dope99,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Gerald Milton should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Gerald Milton.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8   (Talk) 13:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for abusing multiple accounts and persistent disruptive editing, including repeatedly removing an "Articles for deletion" notice from an article, despite being told several times that doing so is unacceptable, removing content from the corresponding "Articles for deletion" discussion, attempting to give the impression of multiple editors supporting your position in a discussion by posting from numerous accounts, opening totally spurious "Articles for deletion" discussions, evidently as a sort of "revenge" for the fact that the article you created is under discussion, and other disruptive editing. Considering the extent of your disruptive editing, and the thoroughly dishonest way you have done it, you are lucky not to have been blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Dec 2014
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. War wizard90 (talk) 00:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Dope99. Thank you. War wizard90 (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)