User talk:Dora the Axe-plorer

Why are you saying my editing is disrupting? Please NPA
Remember Wikipedia is not a place for personal attack, next time you will be reported, i edited the article long before you, you are no one to judge which is problematic and which is not check July 2022, alswo I gave WP:RS. Anyway I don't want to engage with Wp:EW but this is a STRICT warning, next time you falsely accuse me of problematic edit be ready to be reported! See WP:ASPERSIONS. I am a busy person now and to avoid WP:EW which seems to be your desire will refrain now but will add it later again when am free, but if you are gonna edit Wikipedia follow the rules and never engage in Personal Attack! Dilbaggg (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * And your reply here is a threat whichI can also report FYI@Dilbaggg Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 09:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * This is not a reply it is called a warning, we have the right to warn those who violate Wikipedia guidlines, anyway unlike your aggressive WP:EW mentality edit I decided not to start content dispute now as per WP:TRR, but I warn you again not to leave personal attacks on your edit summary and I will fix the mess later, no time to seek WP:DR at the moment cause of my busy life but hope to fix it tgo the actual older version where this entry was there before when I am free. Dilbaggg (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Dilbaggg Falsely accusing someone of personal attacks when you don't have evidence is a problem. You are not warning, you are threatening me without basis. Present your evidence Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 10:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This is again another warning, be grateful that I did not report you yet, see edit summary you canot change it quoting you " Disrupting the list", "causing problems" these are personal attacks, check WP:ASPERSIONS, I am letting you also cause you are new to the guidelines, but do not test my patience, I gave valid reason and long before you started editing this entry was removed without proper consensus, I hope you can learn from this mistake, anyway it may be added back later as it was removed without consensus, sadly I am currently kinda busy and don't want WP:TRR broken, but do not engage in personal attacks again and best wishes to you on your future on Wikipedia, take care. Dilbaggg (talk) 10:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The list has been ranked with the top 10 entries, you added an additional one to make it 11, that's not disruptive? Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 10:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I did that cause I didn't want to remove the 1920 earthquake just yet, we are allowed to change the title, check the title before 2010, then before 2020, titles can change, ok maybe it wasn't right to change title heading but I did that to not exclude the 1920 earthquake just yet but if any gets removed than its that one, as the list is of the highest estimated death toll, WP:RS supports it and check old edits and you can see even 2 years ago 1556 earthquake was there and was removed without consenus. Anyway no hard feelings, you seem to be a good editor, but just don't accuse other editors of wrong things which count as personal attack and assume WP:AGF and 1556 one can be added back anytime as it was removed without consensus. Dilbaggg (talk) 10:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Dilbaggg I started a discussion in the list's talk page, I hope we can find common grounds and agree on something. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 10:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Anyway this warning is not a punishment, it is your chance to become a better editor and comply with WP:NPA and avoid WP:EW and actually learn guidlines, also I can add it back (after a certain time) as it was originally there long before you came and it was removed without WP:RfC, a consensus would be needed to remove it, not add it, but am busy for now, good day. Dilbaggg (talk) 10:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * BTW telling me you have edited the page before I for personal validation to prove you are "superior" .. tell me that's not a threat/attack Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 10:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I am not trying to be superior, I have the right to warn editors about personal attacks! Don't do it again and take care. Dilbaggg (talk) 10:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I strongly disagree with that, looking at the wording in your edit summaries. That felt like an attack and if I interpret it as an attack or threat, it is one, irregardless of your actual intentions. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 11:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Cheers! Happy listening Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 12:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

We don't stylize song titles
Regarding your creation of this article, we would not stylize the article title like that anyway per MOS:CT and MOS:CAPS. Also, I think you know there was nothing located at So High School, so you should have at least requested a move of So High School (song) at WP:RM/TR, even though this song isn't particularly notable on its own yet, so don't be surprised if another Taylor Swift-focused editor comes along and redirects it. Thank you.  Ss  112   04:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * @Ss112 If you looked into the article history, I was in the midst of developing. I don't have another set of arms to complete two tasks at the same time. Thanks for completing the move Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 05:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You don't need "another set of arms". Fair enough that you may have been in the process of developing the article, but after creating an article, it would have taken a matter of seconds to pull up another tab (which every modern Internet browser is capable of doing) and navigate to WP:RM/TR to request it be moved. In case you're in the process of making them, not every one of Swift's album tracks needs an article—Ippantekina and another user redirected several you created the other day. All that being said, this isn't to say that you wouldn't have requested the move. But in case you weren't going to, this is also for future reference.  Ss  112   14:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Good for you making the move before I had the chance because I was doing something else even though it would've taken me a matter of seconds. Wonderful
 * Sincerely, an editor who's quite familiar with RM/TR but was in the midst of developing content and found the bit about tabs a poor attempt at humor Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 14:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

1974 Dunedin earthquake
Hi I've been working on a draft (still a long way from finishing) for the Draft:1974 Dunedin earthquake. After a bit of work I started to question its notability, and now I to think it falls short. The reason I'm asking for your help is because I want to avoid having all time wasted.

Do you agree with my assessment that the earthquake is not notable? To sum it up, it had a VIII/VII intensity, it was only magnitude 4.9 but caused NZ$3.5 million in damages (a source says this is "extraordinarily large" for this magnitude), which was mostly minor. There were no reported casualties. The region is seismically inactive, with this earthquake being the largest since European settlement and the first to cause widespread damage. The earthquake is still occasionally covered in media, but this is regional. I have found some scientific coverage, but unfortunately it is not much. Am I right in that it is not notable?

I was thinking that if the earthquake is not notable, a way to save my work would be to create (or add to) a list article, but I can't find any earthquake lists on Wikipedia that go beyond tables. Do you have any ideas? Thanks for the help on the 2009 Dusky Sound earthquake, by the way. ―Panamitsu (talk) 10:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)


 * You may be able to add this section of content under the history header of Dunedin, or create a new header for Geology and include this event inside (then you'll have to create content for the city's geological history otherwise this header won't work). Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 13:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

It just a mistake that i made
Hello, it's me, Bakhos. Five days ago, I edited the "2024 southern Peru earthquake" page, mistakenly switching VI (Strong) to VIII (Severe) in the "Earthquake" section. I thought it was VIII (Severe), but it’s actually VI (Strong). I didn't hijack it, it was just a mistake that I made. By the way, please don’t make fun of me. You said "whoever you are" because I might have minor depression, which makes it hard for me to talk to people, but sometimes. I worry that someone might make fun of me for no reason. Bakhos2010 (talk) 16:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)


 * @Bakhos2010, this edit falls under WP:HIJACK (content was altered without introducing a new source, regardless of the context). At the time of my edit, I didn't bother to look through the history list to find the editors who did that (there were a few), but the MMI was altered several times prior. It wasn't meant to be a personal attack at you, rather, a message to editors, specifically those who have or intend to change the MMI, to introduce new references if altering a cited paragraph. "Whoever you are" was intended for all editors, IP or registered, not for one specific editor per above. In no way did I meant to upset you, and I hope you receive the help you need for what you're going through. All the best. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 17:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)