User talk:Doraannao

Re:image

 * I will list it for deletion for being UE (unencyclopedic). Speedy deletion is not feasible here since it is relevant to the topic, and has no copyright problem and no other issues, so it does not qualify for  these criteria.

Thanks. &Lambda;ua&int; Wi  se  (talk) 16:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Indeed,it is such a shame that they stayed there for that long, and no one bothered to remove them, let alone notice them. In fact, they are not hidden or something, but were in plain sight in 2 articles, 2 notable articles, with a caption that one can not miss. Thanks for reminding me of this, I must admit that I almost forgot about them, so you are the one to be credited with their removal.
 * Cheers. &Lambda;ua&int;  Wi  se  (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Clearly an interesting field you got there, and Wikipedia may not have many people specializing in that area, that's why your role is important here. I hope you continue to contribute to Wikipedia; I have seen that you are already contributing to major articles such as the Critical theory and Philosophy. Great job! Ah, as for the image, it will deleted very soon, and I will clean the articles that contain it after deletion. You did not do anything wrong and need not to apologize for anything...one editor has pointed out above-on my talkpage- that one could be more precise and I told him that this is not necessary or required.If you need any help, you know where to find me.Cheers! :)  &Lambda;ua&int;  Wi  se  (talk) 13:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * And he put it there 2 days ago... How could this image pass all wikipedians patrolling recent changes is something I can not understand. I removed the image from article rose. Funny thing was that not only he put his painted image next to Renoir's but also his image was bigger in size! A sign of utter disrespect if you ask me. Well, for the moment let's keep an eye on him, we still do not know if he is doing that for the destructive humour found in vandalism or he does not honestly know Wikipedia rules. Your contributions to Wikipedia are welcomed, and it is not complicated at all, it just seems that way, so here are a couple of links that will tell pretty much everything one needs to learn to edit WP:Tutorial and How_to_edit_a_page... good luck and thanks. Cheers :). &Lambda;ua&int;  Wi  se  (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Grrrlriot (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hey
Just letting you know that I responded to your comment on my talk page: User_talk:Grrrlriot I replyed there. --Grrrlriot (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Just thought you might be interested in this: WikiProject Gender Studies/Feminism Task Force --Grrrlriot (talk) 00:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Castoriadis
Dear Doraannao, I'm not sure about his love life / marriage. I don't know a whole lot about C's biography. I only began to read him seriously in 2007, and am mostly interested in his ideas about AUTONOMY. On that topic, he's caught the attention of those of us interested in power and anarchism. Anyway, I'd be glad to learn more of his bio, but don't have it handy. I suggest following the links at the bottom of the Castoriadis page, where you're surely get the answers you seek. Best, Smilo Don (talk) 16:17, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Come hang out with us!
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap. I hope you'll join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 23:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Doraannao!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 04:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)